Watch Inconceivable For Free

Why so much hype?

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.

Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

Probably the worst acting ever and shall we mention Nick Cages hair???? To dye for!

You will note several ten-star reviews, clearly written by the director or his cronies. So, skip those - how do I know this? Because this is what they do - and no one could be that stupid as to give this film ten stars. Then he has thousands of his nearest and dearest friends upvote it on the main page.There is no need to pontificate on how bad this film - the script is horrible, the photography is digital (and I don't mean that as a positive), and I can't feel for Nicolas Cage because he obviously enjoys the dough and likes working. Faye Dunaway was clearly bamboozled by the moron director - clearly. She should, at this point, take a leaf from Jane Fonda's book and attempt to not slum. Because when you slum like this, no one will hire you to do something worthwhile. BTW, the "director" described this to the press as a comeback role for her. Uh huh. She has maybe six minutes of screen time.Gina Gershon, as others point out, gives it her all, but I've never thought much of her all and even if she were Meryl Streep there is simply nothing to be done with either the character or the insufferable dialogue. I found Nicky Whelan ever so annoying, all schmacting all the time. So where does all this end up? Correct, the director, someone named Jonathan Baker. a) he is a terrible director. b) he is a terrible director, and c) he is also a terrible actor who put himself in this film. Oh, and d) he is a terrible director and, having read up on him, a man of limitless chutzpah and ego. What else is new? The man's claim to fame is The Amazing Race. He has exactly five acting credits, one feature film credit (this one) and that's it. So how exactly did he bamboozle these actors and the people who funded the film? Well, apparently he has money from somewhere - his wife perhaps? Family? Because apparently he put in a million bucks of his own money. Well, that's one way to direct a film. He's also apparently funding a documentary about - him. I'm not making this up, folks. This guy is everything that's wrong with the movies today and hopefully after the failure of this wretched film we will not be subjected to another film from him. The film cost twelve million dollars with, I'm sure, a good deal of that going to the actors he "bought". Certainly none of it went into the filming, which took fifteen days. Who can blame Mr. Cage for taking a large check like that? Or Ms. Dunaway? Or Ms. Gershon? And the film's gross? Under $300,000. So, a complete and utter disaster. I found exactly two legit reviews - the LA Times and the Hollywood Reporter - both hugely negative as they should be - sorry, Mr. Baker, money can't buy that for you. Shame on you and shame on everyone involved. Learn how to read a script and just say no. Learn anything, but stop wasting people's time.Finally, to the morons and friends of the director who loved the "twist" at the end - what twist? There was no twist at the end. Just shameless lying by the screenwriter/director to get you to believe one thing when another is true. That's not a twist, that's idiocy. And there you have it.

A mother looks to escape her abusive past by moving to a new town where she befriends another mother, who grows suspicious of her. Inconceivable has the same plot like every other movie about abusing past and troubled minds and it does it more poorly than other films i'm afraid. The acting isn't exactly Oscar Worthy but it's not bad either considering the name 'Nicolas Cage' but the terrible plot and pacing make for an Inconceivable movie i'm afraid. (0/10)

This could have been a really good movie. It had all the elements, and kept my attention, but there were too many random jumps in time and things that just weren't explained. The big one? How did Katie even become their surrogate. We can assume that once Linda died, Katie was the next logical choice, but it's a scene that should have been left in. Nicky Whelan did a great job, but I can't help but wonder what would have happened if the role had not been recast.It's too bad really since this movie had a lot of potential. Storyline had potential, twists were nice, but just too many things that could have gone in there to have it make a little more sense and keep it flowing a little more smoothly.Cage was wasted completely in this movie. He has his highs and lows, but this was definitely a low. Anyone could have played the role of Brian -- it was a supporting role at best, and there was no personality given to his character. Gina Gershon is always fabulous, but she wasn't given a lot to work with either unfortunately. Ultimately, this would have worked better as a Lifetime made-for-TV movie instead of a theatrical release. It had amazing potential, and is still worth checking out, but is definitely not theatre-calibre.