Watch Behind Enemy Lines II: Axis of Evil For Free
Behind Enemy Lines II: Axis of Evil
Navy SEALS, headed by Lt. Bobby James, are dispatched to North Korea on a covert mission, all in an effort to take out a missile site...
Release : | 2006 |
Rating : | 4.5 |
Studio : | 20th Century Fox, |
Crew : | Art Direction, Production Design, |
Cast : | Matt Bushell Denis Arndt Ben Cross Keith David Bruce McGill |
Genre : | Adventure Action Thriller |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
Related Movies
Reviews
You won't be disappointed!
Expected more
Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay
Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.
a pure failure of a film the director got changed & the story is a mess involving vast amount of video footage from various new channels and mass politics,made me though is this a jack Ryan film i am watching,who was responsible for bad script,camera holder and bad cast.we all have seen behind enemy lines 2001 and that is a fantastic film there was no sequel needed that film was theatrical this was a direct home release it so bad that you cant even dump it in the sea the water will come outside a great example of how to make a bad film.the story:navy seals go into the north Korea to attack a missile site that could possible launch a nuclear attack.the never ending dialog's and bad actors are present there is only one guy who was doing some acting is Kenneth Choi plays Korean ambassador,john moor the director of the first film must be angry over this.this film got zero detail to be even considered a film or even a documentary. plus why this is called axis of evil.behind enemy lines 2:axis of evil never works and its totally unwatchable my rating is 1/10 Skipp it.
Not many movies are so bad, I stop watching them. This is one. I saw the first Behind Enemy Lines, and it was an OK action movie. Not too special, but quite enjoyable to watch. I expected something similar with this part II. Boy, was I wrong! For an action movie, first of all this film is s - l - o - o - o - w - w: only after about an hour the action starts. Second, if you are a bit sensitive, you will get motion sick by the totally unnecessary jerky camera movements. If it weren't that annoying, it would be laughable that the director tried to hide the lack of real tension or action by heavy shaking of the camera. Third, the reaction of the North Koreans is totally unbelievable. I mean, a prisoner who is liberated will commit suicide?? And a North Korean army officer will allow an American seal to blow up a rocket?? Already a shallow introduction to North Korean society will reveal how it functions and what role the army plays.I couldn't take it any longer, I tried, but finally I HAD to stop watching. Don't bother watching this movie, it's a waste of time.
all i can say is why bother? no relation to the first film, horrendous directing at best the acting was average, so bad i couldn't be bothered to watch it all. the silly colours meant to depict different parts of the world was a joke, i have travelled all over the world and the light doesn't change from grey to blue to orange anywhere on earth so why does it need to in this movie? the plot had more holes than a 1970s lancia and the whole film looks like a 10 year old kid could have done the gunfire better on a PC in his bedroom. about as fulfilling as spending a couple of hours looking the ceiling. it truly amazes me that films like this are given any budget at all
Don't waste your time downloading/buying this, how in the world did they get any1 to spend money on making this?? And those really annoying transitions and video effects, the use up all Adobe Premiers effects gallery every 4 minutes, this only to take you away from the bad acting and bad storyline.I used 7 minutes to See the film only fast-forwarding !!!! watching paint dry would get an Oscar compared to this! BAD BAD BAD......(1.time I ever bothered to write a comment, it was that bad :-)) _________________________________sorry for the following section, some rules they have for commenting.....Well it seems to be too few words I have written to be able to inform the public, not a very good rule this that all comments has to be 10 line or more but not exceeding 1000 words. I mean the world already has enough BLOB-WARE eg. Office pack. It should be allowed not to spam when you need to make a point??