Watch Lady Chatterley For Free

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

i must have seen a different film!!

Best movie of this year hands down!

A Masterpiece!

Wow. I really dislike slow moving romances, but the amount of artistry that was injected into this production, and the rendered result is just pure art in every sense of the word.Every shot is an oil painting. I don't know what it is about the French and their history with art that makes them such masters, but not a single strip of film was wasted here. The lighting, the costumes, the camera angles, and composition of the frame and music, really were just given such care that it's a wonder this film hasn't gained more notoriety among D.H. Lawrence enthusiasts.Then there are the sex scenes. Yes ladies and gentlemen, there is sex in this film, though it's rendered with a very gentle brush stroke by a master painter of film. There is nothing tawdry in the nature of the sex other than the fact that the couple is bucking societal convention. To find out what I mean, you have to watch the film.This is a story about a woman's wants and needs. Whom she married because modern convention pushed her in that direction, and what she really wanted because her innate nature and the man in question succumbed to proper instincts.One man has societal power and wealth, but cannot care for himself without the assistance that his wealth affords. Another can withstand adversity after adversity, and like so many men, prefers, prospers, and even thrives when he's alone. One is the master of men. Another is the master of himself, and cares for no other. Ladies, which do you prefer? Which do you say you want, and which one fires your heart, body and soul? That's what this movie is all about. On an even more intellectual level both males have a kind of female inner psyche working for them. One gains the world, the other gains something else.I have two regrets about this film. Firstly that there are a couple of pans (and one awful zoom) that come lose to derailing the flow of the movie. But as visually jarring as they are, they pass quickly. Like a B-movie producer/director once told me, America makes the best dollies and tripods for professional movie cameras, and that is an unchallenged truth. If you look at any foreign film, and compare the camera moves with American movies, you'll note that American films have very smooth dolly shots, Steadicam shots, and the now occasional rare pan. Foreign films are still playing catchup, even for this film which was shot only ten years ago! Secondly; I streamed this film off of Amazon, and it is not a high definition transfer with muted colors. The colors I'm thinking were a creative choice of the director and cinematographer, and they may have even used a soft lens or a soft filter in front of the lens to add that bit of visual texture to give this film an even softer touch and intimate feel. Even so, I wanted to see more information on the screen, but whether it was the creative team being artistic or the limitations of the technology, I'll never know until I see this thing on bluray.Here's the thing; I was forced to read D.H. Lawrence in high school, and hated his writing. It was slow, lethargic, seemed to cater to over emotionalism, and just downright boring as hell when compared to some of the sci-fi authors or military fiction authors I used to read (and get more out of), but this film (and the French really do love Lawrence) very much delivers a film maker's film. And, as usual from French cinema, gives us a character study of the gentler side of human nature. What is, what we'd like, and what ought to be.I don't recommend this film to anyone who is not a cinema aficionado. If you like heavy psychology and films about how a trist can be mistaken or evolve into love, then this film is for you.Otherwise, maybe give it a shot and see what you think.Enjoy.

First we may talk about the general atmosphere of this remarkable movie. All sceneries are very beautiful, accurate and full of meaning: the landscapes, the interiors and the characters' clothes like we would expect in a reproduction of events which take place in mid-twenties of last century. In what concerns the plot and story we must keep always in mind that at the time most Victorian moral values still prevail and we must see the movie against this background so what wouldn't be revolutionary nowadays was revolutionary indeed at the time. This is the well told, well acted and well directed story of a woman awakening for the physical side of love life. She is the aristocratic rich wife of a no less aristocratic and rich man who is nevertheless an invalid ridden to a wheelchair for life and sexually impotent of course. This awakening begins when she sees for the first time her husband's gamekeeper naked above his waist and washing himself. She is then overwhelmed by a great psychological trouble and the ensuing uncontrollable need of meeting him again leads her to go to see him once more and finishing by surrender herself to make love with him. The first two love scenes were so quick that she doesn't get to any climax and only during the third scene where she takes a more active part does she reach a full orgasm. It's curious however (but quite in accordance with social patterns of that time) that during the first love scenes between the two the relation master-servant maintains itself before and after sex and only later does it gain a more personal and intimate nature. After the third love scene she even thanks him for it like if it had been a service rendered by him which offends him a lot. This adaptation of the second version of the literary masterpiece novel by the British writer D. H. Lawrence is a great success indeed. This novel was banned as pornographic when it was published first time and only in the sixties of last century a court declared it not pornographic according to he real difference between pornography and eroticism which exists though many people still don't know it but it's out of the scope of this review to explain. Sex is a force of nature and indeed a part of human relations and the literary or artistic works based on it can be object of aesthetic (in the broad sense) evaluation notwithstanding any possible moral evaluations which are not within the scope of a literary or a film essay.

Totally captivated by this film - so much so that stayed up til 4 a.m. to watch it on a satellite channel. The leading actress was magnificent. Read the book many years ago and this version is so faithful to the intent of D.H. Lawrence. In fact makes the whole scenario utterly believable. Disagree with one reviewer who implies that the film makes Sir Clifford sympathetic by not referring to industrial unrest with miners when in fact it is specifically mentioned on more than one occasions - there is mention of a strike and Sir Clifford actually says to Connie that he will break the strike and even if that means loss of business for him that won't matter as he has plenty of other means of income. The beauty of this film is that the characters are multi dimensional and thus thoroughly believable.

Secret rendezvous in a forest that shows beauty of nature season by season. They are no longer young, but the movie has innocent atmosphere as though I am watching an adolescent movie. And in fact, they behave like youths.The original novel 'Lover of Lady Chatterlay' had given special impact on Japanese society. In early 1960's, its Japanese translator and the publisher were indicted as disseminating an obscene book. It caused nationwide dispute about obscenity and freedom of expression. Finally the Supreme Court declared it is obscene. That was why when I read the novel by Ito Sei's translation, most of the parts that depict sex had been omitted. Still I felt it was a great novel. I thought it was a story of a woman who struggles for freedom from the suffocating class society when world is changing under industrial revolution. Now watching the movie without having removed sexual parts, I received the message that sex gives freedom and open their mind to others. It is the opposite portrayal of sex from the movie like 'Realm of the Senses', where sex ruins and destroys humanity.By the way, there is an important scene when Lady Chatterlay is moved with tears watching lovely chick on her palm. This is I believe very critical in the whole story, but I don't think it is acted convincingly. I think this is one of few flaws.Another question. While Lady Chatterlay is traveling in Europe, Lord Chatterlay suddenly becomes very active and the lady is surprised he can walk with crutches. What does it mean? Did Mrs. Bolton give him anything special?