WATCH YOUR FAVORITE
MOVIES & TV SERIES ONLINE
TRY FREE TRIAL
Home > Drama >

The Lion in Winter

Watch The Lion in Winter For Free

The Lion in Winter

Henry II and his estranged queen battle over the choice of an heir.

... more
Release : 1968
Rating : 7.9
Studio : AVCO Embassy Pictures,  Haworth Productions, 
Crew : Art Direction,  Set Decoration, 
Cast : Peter O'Toole Katharine Hepburn Anthony Hopkins John Castle Nigel Terry
Genre : Drama History

Cast List

Related Movies

Babycakes
Babycakes

Babycakes   1989

Release Date: 
1989

Rating: 6.7

genres: 
Drama  /  Comedy  /  Romance
Stars: 
Ricki Lake  /  Craig Sheffer  /  Paul Benedict
Chill Out
Chill Out

Chill Out   2000

Release Date: 
2000

Rating: 5.3

genres: 
Drama  /  Romance
The Dare Project
The Dare Project

The Dare Project   2018

Release Date: 
2018

Rating: 7.2

genres: 
Drama  /  Romance
Stars: 
Adam Fleming  /  Michael Cassidy  /  Adam Hagenbuch
Bad Parents
Bad Parents

Bad Parents   2012

Release Date: 
2012

Rating: 3.4

genres: 
Drama  /  Comedy
Pony Glass
Pony Glass

Pony Glass   1997

Release Date: 
1997

Rating: 6.6

genres: 
Animation  /  Drama  /  Comedy
Carol of the Bells
Carol of the Bells

Carol of the Bells   2019

Release Date: 
2019

Rating: 7.5

genres: 
Drama
Stars: 
RJ Mitte  /  Donna Pescow  /  Donna Mills
Paradise Now
Paradise Now

Paradise Now   2005

Release Date: 
2005

Rating: 7.4

genres: 
Drama  /  Thriller  /  Crime
Stars: 
Ali Suliman  /  Amer Hlehel  /  Hiam Abbass
Billy Elliot
Billy Elliot

Billy Elliot   2000

Release Date: 
2000

Rating: 7.7

genres: 
Drama  /  Comedy  /  Music
Stars: 
Jamie Bell  /  Gary Lewis  /  Julie Walters

Reviews

Wordiezett
2018/08/30

So much average

More
Intcatinfo
2018/08/30

A Masterpiece!

More
ChanFamous
2018/08/30

I wanted to like it more than I actually did... But much of the humor totally escaped me and I walked out only mildly impressed.

More
Taha Avalos
2018/08/30

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

More
clanciai
2017/10/05

Most people seem to exalt this film to supreme top standard, while no one finds anything wrong with it. Maybe it's time for some alternative view.It's good, of course, everything is excellent, the acting is perfect, Katharine Hepburn reigning supreme and defeating everyone by just being what she is, and her part of the dialogue strikes everyone down. Peter O'Toole is next to it, and the three intriguing sons, only one of them being a bastard while he denounces them all three as bastards, add to the total family conflict. This could actually be the inner conflict of any family, these controversies are quite normal, and you could find the same pattern even in almost any Danish dogma film. Their quarrel isn't unique, they just carry it to extremes by overdoing it with a vengeance, and all except Katharine Hepburn almost go under in the process.So the story isn't really very remarkable. They just happen to be royalties, a king and queen and princes, and that's all. It all happens within the castle, almost within four walls, and is really a chamber play, unlike the four years earlier 'Becket', which was much more of a monumental story and drama and historically more correct, although they also took considerable liberties with facts there. Here it's all conjecture, it's a mess of a speculation in intrigue, and they even mix homosexuality into the slander to make it as worse as possible. Hence it's actually a rather artificial concoction of a drama just for showing off, but it's splendid theatre all the way. The dialogue is a feast of sumptuous quarrelsome eloquence, and especially the Queen constantly surpasses herself in delivering poisonous knockouts under the belt.Peter O'Toole was even better in ' Becket', but here he repeats the same role as a 12 year older man and convincingly. He is aging, he is losing control, he has reasons enough to worry about the future, while his sons are more than catching up with him. Prince John is something of a caricature and almost a parody of himself, Anthony Hopkins as Richard is not quite ready yet and too much into his mother to be recognizable as Richard, while Geoffrey is the best of them as a cool calculating bastard.Rosamund, his mother is constantly mentioned while she does not occur in either of the films, although her part in fact was extremely important, especially in the circumstances of Becket's death, but here at least her presence is constantly felt, as something of a bad conscience and lingering wet blanket for the entire all too powerful family for their own good. Neither Richard nor John became very happy as kings, which all films and history show, let alone Walter Scott.John Barry's music, finally, adds to the genuineness and atmosphere of the 12th century. He used to make music to thrillers and James Bond, but he is just as eloquent here with choirs and nunneries and efficient medieval bells.It's a great film, of course, but I still prefer 'Becket'.

More
Alessandro Vincinni
2016/06/06

These days you can find much better historical films, and I don't mean Hollywood blockbusters. This film feels very weird, it is an obvious attempt to create a "great" historical play worthy of the great bard, however the result is a poor mock-up. The standard recipe followed by the script is to portray "complicated" characters, who change their mind every minute like a wind and go from quiet to yelling all the time. This mess should be interpreted as a chess game of plots and intrigues. It is also weird to see that king Henry II played by O'Toole runs around the castle like a village kid. It is just not believable that this chap holds in fear two countries and all his family. Hepburn is overacting and predictable. Hopkins as Richard is a disaster unless you want to believe that he was a soul searching majordomo. John is portrayed like a young imbecile, exactly like in a later Disney's cartoon "Robin Hood", who for some crazy reason should inherit the crown.If you want to see a real historical/theatrical drama with a similar plot, but where characters are portrayed much more realistically I would recommend "Louis XI: Shattered Power".

More
richard-1787
2015/02/27

I hadn't seen this movie in years. Once I started watching it, though - just before the crucial scene in Philip's room - I couldn't stop. There's one great scene after the next, where I just sat marveling at the way the actors delivered their lines.After awhile, I realized how much this resembled "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf" in Medieval costume. Family members ripping each other's guts out every chance they get, often by tearing the scabs off old wounds. The language is more "noble," of course, and the lines delivered in a more oratorical, theatrical fashion, but it's still pretty much the same thing, with O'Toole - who is really marvelous in this movie - for Burton and Hepburn for Taylor.This isn't the sort of movie I would want to watch often, I confess. But it was certainly a great pleasure to see it again today.

More
JasparLamarCrabb
2014/08/03

Certainly well mounted but is it really much more than a soap opera circa 1150? Katherine Hepburn is Eleanor of Acquitaine, released from jail by husband Henry II (Peter O'Toole) for Christmas. Their power struggle to name an heir to the throne goes on for two hours plus with witty one- liners thrown out like Molotov cocktails. The two leads, along with Anthony Hopkins, Timothy Dalton, Jane Merrow, John Castle, and Nigel Terry, act up a storm reciting James Goldman's acid tinged dialog with a lot of gusto. One is left, however, with a feeling of emptiness as this movie drones on and on. It's exhausting. The direction (which consists primarily of having a camera follow the players around) is by Anthony Harvey and the production values are all first rate from the cinematography by Douglas Slocombe to the faux-regal score by John Barry. This movie one many awards including the Oscar for its screenplay.

More
Watch Instant, Get Started Now Watch Instant, Get Started Now