Watch She's the One For Free

Wonderful Movie

Great Film overall

Best movie ever!

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

Growing up my dad had the soundtrack for this movie. I listed to it quite a bit and really grew to love Tom Petty's music. The other day I was shuffling through my soundtracks and found it again and decided to see if I could find the movie online.Sadly, the music seems to be the only good thing about the movie. The characters are either morose, malicious, or just maniacal. I couldn't relate to any of them.Do yourself a favor and just download the soundtrack off itunes or something.

All around bad movie. I start it with that, so people who have their hopes up for a good review can just read that and know that this movie sucked! The only reason why it got anything close to a decent rating was because of Jennifer Aniston…she was funny, adorable, and charming in her role. The writer, Edward Burns…may think of getting himself a different job. I mean, I've seen some of the movies he's written, directed, and acted in…and they have (for the most part) all sucked! Now, when he is just acting in a movie (like the movie 27 Dresses), he is actually good. Maybe he needs to spend a little more time with his work…or maybe he should just stick with acting and leave writing and directing alone for a while.For daily movie reviews visit: http://kimsmoak.com/

Dry as a bone relationships comedy ends up being too parched to produce the humour needed.Heavily reliant on good performances, the cast (including Ed Burns, Mike McGlone, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Anniston, Maxine Bahns and John Mahoney) do well, but there are no standouts.Writer-director Burns is unfortunately unable to endear us to any of his characters in "She's the One", so you won't care who ends up with whom.Super cool, trendy yet uninspiring 90's fare.Sunday, April 16, 2000 - Video

a disappointment. I loved "The Brothers McMullen", it was well written, had an interesting storyline, and was a realistic portrayal of modern "romance". I am not really a fan of romantic comedy since it permeates American television with its pablum, and is disingenuous.Nevertheless, I gave this film a shot. What a mistake. For some reason, whether it is the actors or storyline, it just doesn't work. There are a few funny lines like John Mahoney, when he is commenting on Burns' latest girlfriend: ..."she looks like she is from one of the islands"... Also Michael McGlone was very good in "The Brothers McMullen" but here is portrayed as a complete imbecile. The Cameron Diaz character is unsympathetic and trashy.Amanda Peet is a good actor but could have been given a more significant role. The Aniston character is the same as always. Actually the female characters in this film were superficial and wooden, whereas in "The Brothers McMullen" (mostly a guys point of view) the characters were well-developed. Maybe he should write male characters, mostly; I could say the same about Nicole Holofcener, who does some interesting female characterizations, but cannot write parts for men that are realistic (thereby turning it into a "chick flick" so you alienate the male audience).Well, this film alienates the female audience in the same manner. I liked "Sidewalks of NY" but that was mostly because Stanley Tucci was in it; the Heather Graham character was also portrayed as a somewhat clueless female.That being said, skip this one. Watch "Brothers McMullen" instead. 1/10.