Watch Reality For Free

i must have seen a different film!!

Highly Overrated But Still Good

Absolutely the worst movie.

The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

I really can't be sure what this movie/film is trying to be. It is classified as 'comedy' but I didn't notice a single funny part. (Disclaimer, got 30min in before I walked out) - All the characters are unlikable (as in NOT liked not 'can't decide'), Not sure what each scene was trying to put across, and I couldn't tell how any of them were connected (beyond the 'filmed' part of the girl sleeping) and the jumping back and forth between languages again sort of tossed me.I do get that a lot of people give films by 'outside Hollywood' high ratings simply because its a new / different source, but when a movie is bad that you join the other 20+ people who walked out midway simply because the movie was unlikable (And I can honestly say I always try to give everything a chance, and try to see a reason to 'enjoy' something, but this was a stinker, no other way to describe it, almost like it needed a manual explaining what it was about before u sit down to watch it) So forgive me, I'm not yuppie enough to 'enjoy' this. Was a solid stinker. (At least the first 30min was, maybe it got super awesome and insightful beyond that)

The whole film looks like a time travelling, parallelism or sarcasm topics from the surface. I didn't watch Quentin's other two films, but to me, it's more like a discussion about the reality, just like the name of the movie -- is it real, or it's unreal? Or, which is real, and which is unreal?The director, the producer, the superintendent, the TV show host, the girl, and the father, they are actually represent contradictions, and they are connected. My most impressive story line was the superintendent. He drove his car in a women's dress and sent the old man a bouquet, but he denied for actually did it while seeing the shrink, whereas what he did was being seen by Reality (the girl). However, is Reality really existed? Another one is the TV show host (Denis). He kept scratching and complaining about the eczema that doesn't exit at all (or maybe), but it appeared on the doctor whom he went for the doctor's note. Who really has the eczema? The doctor is Denis or Denis is the doctor? Other than those two, the producer's miserable acts when they started talking about the idea of the movie also represents conflicts.The background music is just like the name of the movie that Jason wanted to make. Wave, it uses organ with little fluctuations on the tones, which exactly like the television waves that keeps sending signals to the audiences, makes you feel confused, anxious, and desire to find out the answer -- even though you may not be able to.What you see may not be real, what is real you may not see.

I've seen my fair share of confusing films throughout my life. But they're usually confusing in such different ways. I don't think i'd ever seen a film quite like this. It can definitely be enjoyable on a scene-to-scene basis, no doubt, but it can also leave you wondering just what exactly is going on. Does the film amount to anything? I'm not quite sure, but I did enjoy it. It's ded=finitely a very divisive film, one where people will either love or hate (and the reason I don't either is because I do think I'm more open tot his sort of thing. I wouldn't recommend this to all audiences (maybe not even to most) but I do think there is a lot of merit here.

Greetings again from the darkness. For those who found last year's Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) to be too linear and overly coherent, be sure to track down the latest from writer/director Quentin Dupieux. You might recognize the name from his films that have developed cult followings – Rubber (2010) and Wrong (2012). Dupieux seems obsessed with the blurred lines between the conscious and sub-conscious, so one can only imagine what he means by titling his movie "Reality". To ensure that we remain in a constant cloud of confusion, there is a key character who is a young girl (Kyla Kenedy) acting in her own movie. Her name is … what else? … Reality.One can't really use the term plot when describing the film, but what follows is my best attempt. Jason Tantra (played by the always terrific Alain Chabat) is a camera man on a locally produced TV talk show about cooking that stars a rat costume-wearing host Denis (Jon Heder, Napoleon Dynamite). Jason wants to make his own movie starring a reluctant Denis (who suffers from eczema on the inside), and pitches his sci-fi idea of human-killing TV sets to film producer Bob Marshall (played by Jonathan Lambert). Marshall agrees to back the movie if Jason can come up with an award-winning perfect groan of pain within 48 hours. Meanwhile Reality (the girl) is being filmed by avant-garde director Zog (John Glover), and she finds a blue video cassette inside the gut of a wild boar killed by her father. In the process of trying to watch the tape, she spots a cross-dressing Eric Wareheim (from "Tim and Eric" fame) driving a military jeep through town. In one of his many dreams, Jason pictures himself at the awards ceremony where he wins for best groan … the award is presented by Oscar winning director Michel Hazanavicius (The Artist) and Roxane Mesquida (who was in Rubber). The topper of all sequences involves Jason having a phone conversation with producer Marshall while at the theatre watching his unmade movie while Marshall simultaneously has an in-person meeting with Jason. If you follow any of the above, this movie is made for you. If you didn't follow any of it, congratulations on your continued socially acceptable level of sanity. Inside jokes abound here, and Dupieux takes a few shots at the filmmaking business, and what constitutes creativity. Fellow French filmmaker Michel Gondry (The Science of Sleep, 2006) may be the closest comparison to Dupieux, but the latter seems more focused on pushing the boundaries of lunacy and yes, Reality.