Watch The Little Vampire For Free
The Little Vampire
Based on the popular books, the story tells of Tony who wants a friend to add some adventure to his life. What he gets is Rudolph, a vampire kid with a good appetite. The two end up inseparable, but their fun is cut short when all the hopes of the vampire race could be gone forever in single night. With Tony's access to the daytime world, he helps them to find what they've always wanted.
Release : | 2000 |
Rating : | 5.7 |
Studio : | New Line Cinema, |
Crew : | Art Direction, Production Design, |
Cast : | Jonathan Lipnicki Richard E. Grant Jim Carter Alice Krige Pamela Gidley |
Genre : | Adventure Fantasy Comedy Family |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
Related Movies
Reviews
Truly the worst movie I've ever seen in a theater
Boring
Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay
While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.
I watched this on account of the TV-listings being too vague and featuring a somewhat loose translation(if it does capture the spirit)... yes, until the title card in the opening credits, I expected this to be My Friend Is A Vampire(on account of this being referred to as My Friend, The Vampire), an '88(the year, not the character of the second Dark Forces video-game... and yes, I admit that that was something of a stretch) film which I was ever-so-slightly more interested in. I decided to cut my losses and give this a chance. I have not regretted doing so. Granted, this is a children's film... very much so. A heavy reliance on the notion that all grown-ups are imbeciles and/or morons, material that no one above the age of ten could possibly find funny and writing that at times is utterly stupid and devoid of logic are all featured. The unendurable kid from Jerry Maguire has grown a handful of years older, not that you could tell(seriously, when he's 90, he's still going to look 4), and he's every bit as obnoxious, starring in this. The acting could stand definite improvement, for the most part. There is at least one bit of utterly unnecessary gross-out comedy, near the end, which lasts for minutes(if it isn't evident every second of those). Worst of all, this has a girl of eleven or twelve referencing To Have and Have Not, by delivering something much too close to Bacall's (in)famous line(but hey, maybe the kids won't get it, here's hoping). Check the Parent Guide for other censorship information. But while all that is certainly true, the film is far from unwatchable. The plot isn't too bad, and it develops reasonably well throughout(as well as makes fairly decent sense, for the genre, "family" film). The pacing is pretty spot-on, this moves just about as it's supposed to. The action parts are actually not too poorly done, and the character of Rookery is not without his cool moments. Some of the humor is downright funny, though it is mostly silly. The special effects vary, but tend to be on the positive side(and hey, it *is* an independent film). Richard E. Grant isn't bad at all. This really *could* be watched by just about anyone, and there is even a possibility that some of the generations/age groups may find themselves enjoying some of the same things in it. I recommend this to, well, anyone. There are many better films out there, and quite possibly better ones to watch with kids/parents, but you could certainly also do considerably worse. 6/10
i actually really enjoyed this it was pretty well made had awesome acting and the plot was really neat and it had stylish direction and some good visuals although not really a horror movie and mostly for kids i found this to be a entertaining little flick so rent it *** out of 5
I loved this movie. I'm a sucker for movies that remind me of my younger years, and this is definitely one of them (well, seeing as it's made for kids, that's hardly surprising). The plot was good, the bad guy wasn't scary enough to give younger kids nightmares, but unlikable enough for the slightly older children not the care that he ISN'T too frightening. Wonderful costumes too.Did anyone notice the last name of the Vampires? Sackville-Bagg? It's freakishly close to that of the Sackville-Bagginses from Lord of the Rings...
This was a very nicely made movie. It was at times amusing and cute. It had wonderful costumes and decoration. Alright, so the acting wasn't the best and the empty `ahhhhhhhh's sometimes did irritate but, hay, Home Alone right? The plot was intricate and made the movie interesting. However I did not really enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I love vampires and anything mystical, so why? The bottom line is, (the fine bottom line that I neglected to pay attention to) that this movie is a kid movie not meant for 16 year old horny vamp lovers. Its childish manner just failed to satisfy. Things did not make sense. They happened as everyone knows they would not were it real. The `bad guy' was laughable. In other words, unless you are dreadfully immature and childish for your age, or are out to watch every single vampire movie out there, do not watch this one past 12, it will not do.