Watch The Ghouls For Free

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Absolutely Brilliant!

At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

Instead of making this movie, writer/director Chad Ferrin could have saved himself a lot of trouble and just worn a big sandwich board around his neck and wrote on it "I have no idea what I'm doing". This is the sort of painfully cheap film that when characters try to walk across the street, they have to stop and let actual traffic go through the scene, so it's already got a couple strikes against it. The inept drudgery of Ferrin's storytelling adds another 87 strikes, sending The Ghouls not just down and out but deep into some nebulous underworld of sucky cinema.Eric Hayes (Timothy Muskatell) is a drunk and a four-pack-a-day smoker trying to eak out a living as a freelance video cameraman. Now, it's immediately obvious when Ferrin wrote this script he had no idea how the TV news business works or what news cameramen actually do, so he basically casts Hayes as some kind of news paparazzo who wanders around Hollywood hoping to get good footage to sell to the highest bidder. That's not what happens in the real world. I know it's a little thing, but failing to do even the most rudimentary research on what he's writing about really symbolizes Ferrin's sloppy efforts here.Anyway, in between obsessing over his ex-girlfriend and trying to sponge off everyone he meets, Hayes stumbles upon the story of a lifetime. He discovers the mean streets of Hollywood after dark have become the hunting ground for albino cannibals. Recruiting a fellow "news paparazzo" for help, Hayes sets out to get video of these ghouls. The rest of the tale is essentially just a bunch of bang-your-head-against-the-wall stupid stuff happening before an ending where it appears Ferrin is working out a grudge against a retarded cousin he never liked.There's so much crap to go over with The Ghouls. At least 30% of the movie appears to be random footage that Ferrin shot in downtown LA at night and then edited together to make his script stretch out to 81 minutes. There's a series of flashbacks where Ferrin displays a clear nipple fetish. A character wears a wig for absolutely no reason. There are several points where Ferrin obviously finds Timothy Muskatell smoking to be the most fascinating image he's ever seen. Eric Hayes is portrayed as a worthless scumbag and he's the "hero" of the movie. There's a character who's supposed to have his skin ripped off but as Ferrin pans the camera across his crotch, you can unmistakably see the outline of the guy's genitals underneath the bodysuit he's wearing for the scene. He looks like one of those anatomically incorrect Ken dolls with tomato paste smeared over him. Again, I know that seems like a little thing, but all Ferrin had to do was pan the camera 5 inches higher or lower to avoid shattering the suspension of disbelief. Of course, to suspend your disbelief for longer than the first 48 seconds of this film, you'd have to be too drunk to walk.The marketplace is flooded with cheap, cruddy horror flicks. However, The Ghouls is several rungs lower than the average cheap, cruddy horror flick. There's some bargain basement gore and violence without any genuine horror or shock. Ferrin makes albino cannibals as exciting as the slides from his grandparents' trip to the Grand Canyon.Don't watch this. Even if you like cheap, cruddy horror flicks, don't watch this. Even if you've seen every other horror movie ever made, don't watch this. You'd be better off watching The Sound of Music on mute while listening to Black Sabbath.

The Ghouls is a shot on video horror film about a man who freelances for local news stations. He drives around at night and films whatever terrible things he can find, then sells the footage. We see that this life is taking its toll on him, but we don't learn until later just how far he has gone.I was lucky to discover this movie without knowing much about it. I can understand how some of the reviewers who saw the DVD box at the store would feel misled. This movie was done on a very small budget, and the horror element (in this case, zombie-like creatures) does not play as big a role as some may have hoped. It is more about this man's torment. He is barely making a living, he witnesses the worst things that go on, he can't keep a relationship, and he has zero respect from his peers or employers. Even the paparazzi don't have this bad an image.When the cameraman happens to stumble on a woman being attacked by the sewer dwelling creatures, he sees it as his big chance to capture an exclusive. Supposedly, footage of one of the attacks will lead to a big payday and a better life. He tries to get his ex-girlfriend involved, but we find out she wants nothing to do with him: she discovered a tape he made of two children trapped in a fire. He continued filming but did nothing to help them.Eventually, while trying to find the creature again, his camera is stolen by a mentally challenged man who uses it to record a murder. The man gets his camera back and the footage left by the special needs killer makes him a success.For me, the movie was successful at creating an atmosphere. The scenes of L.A. at night felt more realistic to me because it was shot digitally. The soundtrack, which was full of ambient noise and some sort of freaked-out jazz, helped the mood along. There isn't much gore because that isn't the point. It's more about what a bottom-dweller this guy has become. I would compare it to the Tony Curtis movie The Sweet Smell of Success. It might not be as well made, but for me, it was just as effective at transporting me into the life of a man who makes his living off of other people's misery.

Through most of the first act it would seem that the title THE GHOULS refers to Eric, the main character (I can't call him the hero.), his buddy Clift, and the other news hounds who cruise Los Angeles looking for bloody, violent crime scenes to videotape and sell to local TV stations. Calling Eric a bottom feeder is generous. When he comes upon a madman plunging a knife into a naked woman he does nothing to save her but instead videotapes the commission of the crime. When he comes upon his buddy Clift taping the end of a police chase he comments that the footage isn't worth anything because the police don't kill anybody.Like I said, he's not a hero. Fact is, he's a mess. He's an alcoholic and a chain smoker. Worse yet, a bearded chain smoker. There may be something besides a dumpster or an open grave that smells worse than a bearded man who's a heavy smoker, but I can't think what it is. And I hope that the excellent actor Timothy Muskatell, who plays Eric, doesn't smoke near that much in real life. His performance is sometimes a little rough around the edges, but he seems to have a tremendous talent and I look forward to seeing him in more films.Eric has a back story. When he was very young his father committed suicide very messily while Eric looked on. So he's gone through life an observer, keeping things at a distance through the lens of his camera.Reading the somewhat inaccurate description on the back of the DVD box you'd expect a retread of one of Romero's LIVING DEAD movies with zombies swarming through the streets of the city and crowds running in terror. Doesn't happen. The truth be told, the story owes more to BLOW UP than any other film I can think of.Eric thinks he's found the story that will make his reputation. He sees what seems to be a group of homeless men dragging a woman into an alley. He pursues with his camera at the ready and begins filming the crime in progress, but soon realizes that this isn't rape. They're eating the woman alive. When Eric turns on the light on his camera the light blinds the creatures (unnaturally pale with strange teeth) and they pursue him to his car and he barely escapes with his life.The second act finds him taking the video to the owner of a local station, thinking that his ship has come in. One small problem- he didn't have any tape in the camera. No pictures, no story, no money.So Eric decides to return to the scene of the crime, which draws him into the dark underbelly of life in Los Angeles. An old man he meets on the street tells him that local people in this poverty stricken area call these creatures The Ghouls, and that they've always been around.So Eric and Clift have their cameras and guns at the ready and go in search of these creatures, sitting and waiting for them to come out.In the third act Eric finds himself up close and personal with the violence and bloodshed that he's watched through the viewfinder so long. But when he's personally involved it's not possible for him to have the cool detachment and cynicism that has marked his work for years.The bottom line is that the monsters, although given their lion's share of screen time, aren't the story. Eric's moral dilemma and moral development are what drives the story. He may come out of this a better and stronger man if he comes out of it alive.This was shot on digital video and, on DVD, looks great- I have no idea what it might look like on a big theatre screen. Michael Mann's COLLATERAL was shot on digital video, too, and also looked good.I have a feeling the budget for this was nonexistent, just like I doubt that the producers bothered getting any permits to film on the streets. This technology doesn't require that big a crew. When B-movie crap like Adam Sandlers THE LONGEST YARD costs $80 million to make, it's refreshing that somebody knows how to get a lot of bang for the buck.This movie has the busiest soundtrack I remember in years. I watched with headphones and the use of stereo was very professionally done. There's always the sound of a police scanner in the background and sound from TV's and radios.THE GHOULS is not without its faults. As stated earlier, some scenes are a little rough and could have used some more polishing. And points were sacrificed because some of the music was flat out annoying. Loud saxophones that sound like sheep bleating don't make my adrenaline pump, they just annoy me. And the blood and guts are excessive. I'm not in junior high so that doesn't do all that much for me. Scare me, don't try to nauseate me.But all in all, an excellent piece of work. Well done, folks. And, as I said, Timothy Muskatell should be a big, big star. Even at this stage of his professional development he could leave Josh Lucas or Hugh Grant in the dust. He and George Clooney never try to be cute aging boys, they're grown men and not ashamed of it. Muskatell is an actor developing his craft, not a cover boy for teen magazines, and that's refreshing to see in this age of bland leading men.

This is the best amateur effort I have watched in a very long time. It is not great, but it is very good for what it is...some stock footage of fires/crimes.. news reel stuff ..to open up on a very interesting story and a few ugly characters.This is low budget , but the stabbing scene was horrific and strong, as was the "rape" that turned out to be cannibalism. WOW.All the Characters are unappealing and the zombies , tho not the worse I have seen , are not too believable. This does not mean it was poorly acted, it is not, and I was quickly drawn into this quirky movie.It is not for everyone, movies like this never are, but if you tolerate average filming, interesting characters, and some disturbing scenes of violence and a simple but cool story line, give this a try, what is 3.00 bucks for a rental anyways? If you do not like it, turn it off. Personally, I was impressed with this low budget effort.