Watch 6 Guns For Free

Don't listen to the negative reviews

It's fun, it's light, [but] it has a hard time when its tries to get heavy.

The first must-see film of the year.

A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.

All around a terrible movie; I started the movie with a positive attitude simply because its a western but as time went on it just got worse, but really what could you expect from a movie with a budget of just 100k. It was way too cheesy and predictable. The majority of the actors weren't great either. The story line seemed a bit stupid, the woman practiced for literally 2 days shooting and at the end was barely able to, then she goes straight into a gunfight resulting in her having to be saved, twice, then after its all over she goes onto become a professional bounty hunter? Seems a bit dumb considering she can't even shoot in the first place. Btw, killing the two kids at the start was stupid, movies seem to do this a lot just for sympathy and I think it's a terrible way to gain the viewers sympathy. Wouldn't give this movie anymore than a 3/10 because even with 3 I'm being a bit generous.

6 Guns was the most disappointing thing since my son. I mean, how much more could you possibly screw a simple western movie? And while my son eventually hanged himself in the bathroom of the gas station, the unfortunate reality of 6 Guns is that it will be around. Forever. It will never go away. It can never be undone. I don't think i will be able to get back the 1 hour and 35 minutes I wasted watching this train wreak. If you want to watch a movie with horrible acting, story, characters, dialogue (crockpot in the 1800s? LOL), sets. Well this is a movie for you. It's like the director was like "It's stylistically designed to be that way and you can't undo that. But we can diminish the effects of it."

I disagree with the other reviewer comparing 6 Guns to True Grit. I don't see much similarity. But this movie 6 Guns has more or less the same plot as Hannie Caulder (1971) differing only in some details that make me like the older movie more. If you do not want to hear 1970s theme music then I guess you have a newer alternative, but it was already an 1800s western period piece in 1971 and I do not feel like we gained much from a newer remake with a low budget.Comparisons: In both movies outlaws kill a woman's family and rape her. She asks a bounty hunter to teach her to shoot and seeks revenge.Bounty Hunter: Barry Van Dyke does an okay job in 6 Guns playing the bounty hunter, but Robert Culp's bounty hunter in Hannie Caulder was more interesting and believable. Van Dyke's portrayal seemed too good natured to me, more like a religious monk/crusader than a guy who kills for pay. I preferred Culp's portrayal.Widow: Both films have an attractive leading lady giving an okay but not great performance as the vengeful widow. Outlaws: Borgnine, Elam and Martin are excellent in Hannie Caulder ranging from scary rapists and murderers to comic bungling robbers. The best performance I saw in 6 Guns was from Geoff Meed who seemed believably formidable and bad natured to me as the leader of the outlaws. Other supporting characters: In 6 Guns these were okay and nothing stand out. Supporting roles in Hannie Caulder were generally well acted and Christopher Lee playing a gunsmith character was very good.Set: 6 Guns seemed a bit claustrophobic to me with a limited number of sets / interiors. Hannie Caulder has expansive exterior location shots and more sets used.If you are interested in 6 Guns I suggest you watch Hannie Caulder (1971)

I should have given up on this low-budget Western set in the 1800s when, just over two minutes into it, the main female character, Selina Stevens, portrayed by Sage Mears, read the line (yes, read, like most of her lines), "I can't lift the Crock-Pot all by myself." Surely, the writer (I use the word loosely), Geoff Meed, isn't so ignorant as to not have a clue that the trade name "Crock-Pot" and the electrical appliance it refers to weren't invented until the early 1970s. Then again, his forte is martial arts and stunts, so maybe he has been knocked in the head once too often. If he didn't know, then surely someone else in the cast or crew, perhaps the honeywagon driver, should have. That's where the script belonged—in the honeywagon.Then, about four-and-a-half minutes in, actor Brian Wimmer as the character Will Stevens, said, "I gotta replace all the shuttlers and windows due to the winds that are coming in." No, that's not a typo, that's exactly what he said—shuttlers. Hey, maybe he just flubbed the line and the low budget couldn't stand the strain of re-shooting the scene. On the other hand, maybe Geoff Meed really should give up the stunts and fighting. Permanent brain damage is no laughing matter.Perhaps The Asylum, known for producing "mockbusters," used these lines as a joke, but they weren't nearly as funny as this joke of a movie.Hard to fathom, but yes, I kept watching to the end, mostly out of fascination with how terrible it was…just as one refrains from turning away from a train wreck. But life is too short to have spent the time watching or to further comment on this train wreck. I hope I've saved someone else the waste of time.