Watch My First Wedding For Free
My First Wedding
A young lady about to get married realizes that she has a problem: she fantasizes about every man she sees. She goes to confess at church but unknowingly confesses to a young man who is not a priest. He agrees to help her, but falls in love with her along the way. Unfortunately she still thinks he is a priest.
Release : | 2006 |
Rating : | 4.7 |
Studio : | |
Crew : | Art Department Coordinator, Assistant Decorator, |
Cast : | Rachael Leigh Cook Kenny Doughty Valerie Mahaffey Paul Hopkins Caroline Carver |
Genre : | Comedy Romance |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
Related Movies
Reviews
I don't have all the words right now but this film is a work of art.
Fantastic!
The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.
It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.
This movie has some very funny scenes.The lead actor is a natural comedian. He reminded me a little of a young Jim Carrey (not quite as over the top though.) I would expect that he might have a bright future ahead in the movie industry if more lead roles come his way.The story is simple and enjoyable. It also has great comedic timing throughout the film. It won't win any Oscars but I have seen far worse scripts than this one.I'm not sure why some previous reviewers were so harsh on it. It is a very upbeat, light and watchable movie.
The fact that this movie stayed on the shelf for over 2 years should be a good indication as to how awful it is.Good looking sex-starved Vanessa, who is not a catholic, walks into a catholic church to confess that even if she's getting married in 3 days, she hasn't slept with her fiancé and she wants to sleep with every guy she sees.Well, believe it or not, the man listening to her confession is the church's handyman, Nick.Of course, Nick wants to take advantage of the situation, so he impersonates a priest and tries to get in bed with Vanessa.Shades of "Three's Company" as far as credibility goes...The improbable premise prevents you from believing everything that happens from that point. If you watch this, you'll suffer through 90 minutes of attempted humor delivered by bad actors in a movie shot in a bleak autumn-feeling Montreal that has rarely looked this bad.Michel Cusson's music is up to the crummy standard he has reached since taking his clichéd TV work to the DTV world: Johann Pachelbel must be turning in his grave ! Another score written while sleepwalking and dreaming of that small check he's gonna cash, laughing all the way to the bank (and leaving any self-esteem behind...). A truly annoying score.Rachael Lee Cook is still a looker, but her bad acting makes her unsympathetic character look truly retarded. Too bad she doesn't have the skill to match that cute face...In the end **spoiler** the guy gets the girl he deserves and you get to hate yourself from having wasted your time, yet again, on a clunker filled with unknowns and a cute young actress who'll never rise above this crap.
I love Rachael Leigh Cook, but this movie doesn't help.....spoiler alert. the story is just awfully..... BAD! i mean it does kinda break some guy laws.. i mean.. you should never ruin another's person's wedding...love happening in under 24 hours? some movies get away with in, but they do it so more tastefully. The acting in the film was pretty eh... below par, not something to build a career on. the plot is just bad... i know i said it before, but I guess the hard part was that you never believe in the movie, nothing is believable, and you're just like love no, break a wedding just wrong... your more logical brain takes over. the plot is unoriginal at heart, girl been with long-time man, new man shows up... long-term man goes bye bye It's suppose to be a chick flick, but i doubt many girls will even like it. you could laugh though, but only at the stupidity of things or like the 'oh my gosh she didn't' parts. this is a rent only film. serendipity has a similar base but is a much better film.
So it ain't so. Why am I constantly disappointed every time I see a Rachel Leigh Cook movie? Her beauty always draws me in, but the lousy scripts that she's constantly attached to always leave me running for the exit. This film is just another example of a film maker taking a beautiful, talented actress and shoving her into a predictable cookie cutter film that lacks originality. I've seen this movie a hundred times before in the last 10 years and I guess I must be a glutton for punishment because as long as I read in the entertainment section of the paper that a goddess like Rachel Leigh Cook is going to be on the big screen I will show up. One of these days I'm hoping I will see her in a film that will be worthy of her talent. This film does not qualify.