Watch Angels in the Outfield For Free
Angels in the Outfield
The short-tempered manager of the Pittsburgh Pirates mends his ways in return for a little divine assistance.
Release : | 1951 |
Rating : | 7.1 |
Studio : | Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, |
Crew : | Art Direction, Art Direction, |
Cast : | Paul Douglas Janet Leigh Keenan Wynn Donna Corcoran Lewis Stone |
Genre : | Fantasy Comedy Family |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
Related Movies
Reviews
To me, this movie is perfection.
Sorry, this movie sucks
Good story, Not enough for a whole film
The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
It's hard to believe that this movie was directed by Clarence Brown, who gave us such masterpieces as Garbo in Anna Karenina, Gable and Shearer in Idiot's Delight, and a very moving adaptation of Faulkner's Intruder in the Dust. Be that as it may, this a a generally flat film, with no real sense of pacing. The actors are all fine - indeed, much better than their material - but they can't make a silk purse out of this sow's ear.Which is not to say that there is nothing of value here, however. The last part of the movie, which doesn't build a lot of tension, nevertheless shows the main character doing something very decent. It could be developed a lot more effectively, I suppose, but there's something very satisfying about that. (I won't go into details, because I wouldn't want to ruin it for anyone.) Yes, this movie is worth watching. It's not close to being a great movie, but it won't waste your time, either.-------------------------I watched this again tonight on TCM. The basic plot - a baseball manager's conversations with angels - is pure fantasy, and not that interesting. It is also very much a repeat of the 1947 20th Century Fox hit Miracle on 34th Street, especially in the final courtroom scene, where, this time, various witnesses are called in to prove the existence of angels, as opposed to Santa Claus. For that, Miracle was a much better movie than this.But where this movie is interesting is its recreation of baseball in the late 1940s/early 1950s. The Pittsburgh "fans" turn downright vicious when they fear leaving an aging pitcher in will cause them to lose the game they need to win the pennant. There are other touches here and there that come off as very real, despite the fantasy of the main story line.As I wrote last year, you won't waste your time watching this movie. Some of it is blatant emotion manipulation. But there are interesting elements in it as well.
i thought this was a very touching heartwarming comedy/fantasy/baseball movie that's suitable for the whole family.sure it's a bit predictable and maybe a bit sappy,and hokey,but not overly.it's good quality entertainment that might just warm your heart.and there's nothing wrong with that.i chuckled quite a bit.i think i even had a tear or two in my eye.this is one of those feel good movies that will lift your spirits if you're feeling down.Janet Leigh and Paul Douglas are great together and Donna Corcoran as eight year old Bridget White is adorable.overall,a very good heartwarming film that the whole family can enjoy.for me Angels in the Outfield is an 8/10
"Angels in the Outfield" (1951) is the one of the best and most original comedies ever made. It is about a baseball manager (Paul Douglas) who loses his temper too much until he hears an angel's voice (James Whitmore), who makes a deal with him. He and his other angels will help the baseball team win games if the manager stops losing his temper. When the deal is set, the manager's life changes. It is a lovely movie to watch. The movie should have been nominated with Academy Awards for the major categories. It was totally ignored. Paul Douglas and Bruce Bennett, as the aging baseball player, should have been nominated for best actor and best supporting actor. They have something in common; both of them made another great movie in their long careers: Douglas made "Letter to Three Wives" and Bennett made "Mildred Pierce". "Angels in the Outfield" was perfectly cast. Another outstanding performance was by Kennan Wynn in his best role and best movie. Mr. Wynn should have been nominated for best supporting actor, too.
Most people may recall the 1994 Walt Disney Pictures remake better than this 1951 MGM original which has basically the exact same plot. However, Hollywood's limitations on special effects and types of sentimentality send this original version downhill and explain its obscurity. Rent the remake instead.