WATCH YOUR FAVORITE
MOVIES & TV SERIES ONLINE
TRY FREE TRIAL
Home > Drama >

Up, Down, Fragile

Watch Up, Down, Fragile For Free

Up, Down, Fragile

The film will tell what happens to a group of characters, precisely between July 14 and August 15, 1994 in Paris. It will tell the story of three young ladies, Louise, Ninon, Ida, in the summer of 1994, their adventures in the big city. On the streets, in the gardens, in ballrooms and in libraries and lofts, deserted at the time of holidays and summer heat, Louis, Ninon and Ida proceed on mysterious paths.

... more
Release : 1995
Rating : 7.3
Studio : Carac Films,  Pierre Grise Productions,  George Reinhart Productions, 
Crew : Director of Photography,  Director, 
Cast : Nathalie Richard Marianne Denicourt Laurence Côte Anna Karina André Marcon
Genre : Drama Comedy Mystery Music Romance

Cast List

Reviews

NekoHomey
2018/08/30

Purely Joyful Movie!

More
SoTrumpBelieve
2018/08/30

Must See Movie...

More
Bluebell Alcock
2018/08/30

Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

More
Logan
2018/08/30

By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

More
zetes
2012/07/23

I'm not very familiar with Rivette, but I did enjoy the other two films I've seen by him (three, technically, counting his Joan of Arc movie as two). This one - I did not enjoy it. It's as purposeless and indifferent as Celine and Julie Go Boating, but nowhere near as enjoyable. It has a handful of enjoyable moments - mostly in its song and dance numbers (it's a musical - when Rivette feels like it). And the three stars, Nathalie Richard, Marianne Denicourt and Laurence Côte, are all quite cute. But, man, does this go absolutely nowhere for nearly three hours. I can only watch Richard dance around like a dope for two hours, tops. Anna Karina also has a small part. I feel like I deserve a trophy for getting through this - I felt like giving up 40 minutes in and I really wish I had.

More
writers_reign
2006/05/27

At university I was once obliged to reply in the form of an essay to the question 'Would Moby Dick be a better or worse book if the scientific sections were omitted'. My reply was along the lines of 'If the scientific parts were omitted Moby Dick would be a shorter bad book' and that's how I often feel about Rivette who seems incapable of shooting anything less than three hours - nothing wrong with that, witness Gone With The Wind - which is okay EXCEPT his ideas are usually worth no more than forty minutes. He exemplifies most of the things wrong with the New Wave, the abrupt cutting in the middle of a scene, characters appearing on the other side of town moments after walking out of frame, insufficient 'back story' and/or information. A typical example in this film. Roland confronts Ninon in her apartment and accuses her of stealing a set of documents (which we have in fact seen her do). She tells him to close his eyes, he obliges, she retrieves the documents from where she had hidden them, tells him to remain seated with his eyes closed and - wait for it - LEAVES the apartment, goes across town and gives the papers to Louise after which they go to a night club and dance. In the next shot Ninon enters her apartment Where, incredibly, Roland is STILL sitting with his eyes closed; in real time this would have to be several hours but Rivette shoots it in such a way as to give the impression of just a few minutes. Okay, call this high Art if you will but Me, I call it SLOPPY film making. The film is full of such sloppiness; it's billed as a Musical yet the first number occurs more than an hour into the story and such music as there is is banal in the extreme. The plot, or what passes for one, is our old friend the three disparate lives who somehow contrive to interweave; the three leading actresses are certainly competent or even slightly better than competent as are the males but there are too many dead ends like the faux suicide club which amounts to little more than a twenty minute self-contained set piece inside a three hour movie and serves no discernible purpose. Ironically I thoroughly enjoyed Rivette's Va Savoir and there are certainly echoes of that movie here in the library scenes and the dormer window utilised by Jeanne Balibar in the latter. On balance this is one to be endured rather than enjoyed.

More
Daniel Karlsson
2002/03/13

You can trust Rivette. The New Wave is not dead! Fresh and enlightening, definitely not boring (despite the Rivette-standard-length). People in Paris during summertime whose stories link together. A sort of ball of yarn that unrolls more and more as you go on watching. The dancing scenes are top-notch. Good Paris views. Any fans of the New Wave films should not miss this film; Anna Karina has a pretty big role and she does it good as ever. She has aged though, as you will see. My favorite scene is in the end when the camera shows inside Karina's house and one of the walls is filled with old posters of Karina. And she says something like: don't bother about that old rubbish.I'll vote it a 4 out of 5. Watchers unfamiliar with French films in general and The New Wave in particular maybe won't find it very interesting though.

More
Andrew Humphrey
2002/01/26

I didn't like it at all, it seemed pointless and silly to me. Just having those two random musical numbers seemed daft rather than stylish. That "Cole Porter" song was horrible.The subplot about the strange murder game just petered out, it didn't make any sense to me at all. There was also an strange moment when Nino and Louise suddenly were great pals, walking down the street arm in arm, having only met vaguely before that.It could have been intriguing and fun, but I thought it was fake whimsical and boring.It was the only thing with English subtitles here in Vientiane, but I wish I hadn't bothered.

More
Watch Instant, Get Started Now Watch Instant, Get Started Now