WATCH YOUR FAVORITE
MOVIES & TV SERIES ONLINE
TRY FREE TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

Divergent

Watch Divergent For Free

Divergent

In a world divided into factions based on personality types, Tris learns that she's been classified as Divergent and won't fit in. When she discovers a plot to destroy Divergents, Tris and the mysterious Four must find out what makes Divergents dangerous before it's too late.

... more
Release : 2014
Rating : 6.6
Studio : Summit Entertainment,  Red Wagon Entertainment, 
Crew : Art Department Coordinator,  Art Direction, 
Cast : Shailene Woodley Theo James Zoë Kravitz Miles Teller Jai Courtney
Genre : Adventure Action Science Fiction

Cast List

Related Movies

The Cowboys
The Cowboys

The Cowboys   1972

Release Date: 
1972

Rating: 7.4

genres: 
Adventure  /  Drama  /  Action
Stars: 
John Wayne  /  Roscoe Lee Browne  /  Bruce Dern
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky

Fire in the Sky   1993

Release Date: 
1993

Rating: 6.5

genres: 
Drama  /  Science Fiction  /  Mystery
Stars: 
D.B. Sweeney  /  Robert Patrick  /  Craig Sheffer
Twelve O'Clock High
Twelve O'Clock High

Twelve O'Clock High   1949

Release Date: 
1949

Rating: 7.7

genres: 
Drama  /  Action  /  War
Stars: 
Gregory Peck  /  Hugh Marlowe  /  Gary Merrill
Cherry 2000
Cherry 2000

Cherry 2000   1988

Release Date: 
1988

Rating: 5.5

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Science Fiction
Stars: 
Melanie Griffith  /  David Andrews  /  Pamela Gidley
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian & The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian & The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian & The Voyage of the Dawn Treader   1989

Release Date: 
1989

Rating: 7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Fantasy  /  Family
Stars: 
Richard Dempsey  /  Sophie Wilcox  /  Robert Lang
Astro Boy
Astro Boy

Astro Boy   2009

Release Date: 
2009

Rating: 6.2

genres: 
Animation  /  Action  /  Science Fiction
Colossus: The Forbin Project
Colossus: The Forbin Project

Colossus: The Forbin Project   1970

Release Date: 
1970

Rating: 7.1

genres: 
Thriller  /  Science Fiction
Stars: 
Eric Braeden  /  Susan Clark  /  Gordon Pinsent
Jetsons: The Movie
Jetsons: The Movie

Jetsons: The Movie   1990

Release Date: 
1990

Rating: 5.5

genres: 
Animation  /  Comedy  /  Science Fiction
Stars: 
George O'Hanlon  /  Mel Blanc  /  Penny Singleton
City of Ember
City of Ember

City of Ember   2008

Release Date: 
2008

Rating: 6.4

genres: 
Adventure  /  Fantasy  /  Family
Stars: 
Saoirse Ronan  /  Harry Treadaway  /  Bill Murray

Reviews

Claysaba
2018/08/30

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

More
Sexyloutak
2018/08/30

Absolutely the worst movie.

More
Afouotos
2018/08/30

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

More
Tobias Burrows
2018/08/30

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

More
brazierbell
2018/07/24

I read all the books. The movie wasn't bad at all. Much prefer the books but still definitely worth the watch. Team dauntless.

More
reesedev
2017/11/29

I have a problem when a decent book is turned into a horrible movie. This was clearly a cash grab, as they hyped beyond its needed range, and I wish there was something good about this movie to say, but I really can't find anything good about it or the series. Please NEVER WATCH THE MOVIE OR SHOW IT TO YOUR CHILDREN!!!

More
Johnghl
2017/08/23

Even though the thoughts written here are relevant at any age of dating and the outcome being the same too that a relationship is not formed or even once the next best thing being in person sex for however long even if long term is the thought I must remember I'm over 60 years of age with some decreased looks and out of shape baggage that goes with it. If I think of twenty things to get someone to do something and even mention one outlet for her not to do so if that one is her wish even with only a 51 to 49 % advantage she'll probably just take that one outlet if she replies at all. This leads to a quick next thought. Not once in any fashion have I ever gotten a direct reply trying to intro or not much next after thoughts with electronic communication to the girl. Some responses of any kind have been detected by me but those ways currently are next to impossible for me to detect. Dating services of any fashion lead nowhere. I did get one response once about 7 years before the Internet existed joining a $700 plus dating service giving a in person application that lead to a car drive and a bar date. That was about the last time I think I had a date. Previous to that I had my share but this letter isn't a review of my life. The number one rule nowadays is that the girl must be lifetime money self sufficient living anywhere. That leads just about everyone out. Only 1 in 1000 are that way and the actresses of any fashion be it over twenty of them who weren't one of the 1 in 1000 used slut entertainment thoughts involving me to be a 1 in a 1000 self money sufficient person but the sad movie or singer concept to that is none of those girls thought that sharing their wealth with me was a requirement or even a intro one in person date let alone my preferred minimun requirement thought of 25 dates. So it's understood outthinking their thoughts of what is best for them or what they want or what they are willing to do is at least in my case impossible to outthink or even partially persuade. I'll just say the difference between me and you girl (any girl) is if the girl approached me by mail or in person giving her contact number she'd have to say next to nothing for me to reply if she was attractive and money self sufficient. But for those that weed out hundreds of suitors per day I've never known any of them to focus and when they focus their focus leads nowhere however public popular. I was going to write about 20 reasons why girls are into idiots but this email is already too long. You can though in the immediate future reach me at [email protected] There's my contact. Need I say again the difference between me and you girl (any girl). The sad fact is 9 out 10 movie concepts are light years from this letter style with many much more so than others yet those sort that yet detect me feel there is some sort of invite to them when there isn't. I could write pages about how mentally ill I would get getting involved with them. But this letter concept is not looking for dismissal with me and IMDb. I sort of had Ashley Judd in mind when writing this being more positive than negative but more or less focus writing to a star is banned here. Personally it's been decades when getting annoyed by people it's by those you can't find however immediate the interpretation and with I don't even know if they qualify for I wouldn't want to know you or them even if I did. Biggest mistake in writing these emails is if you know that any response if at all will lead you to get mentally ill if I involve myself hundreds of times over with them and not much else especially in money concept or marriage dating then why try at all from the get go. Even at the best if a romantic attitude is established it will probably only be done in some group thought fashion and will having nothing to do with being a couple. That's about the only way current Hollywood fashion stays in fashion. I current thought about Ashley is I'm over 50% positive on my approach to her but there is too she'd have to really a lot kiss my over a long time in person for me to really fall. She with me has a current personality interpretation of that ain't going to happen. It's more her charm with me doesn't much get past bye bye soon enough. I'm not looking for either for the girl with I'm not bluffing but I'm gorgeous attitude and she expects me to sex her big time a half hour minimum everyday. Those types only have a place in my life on paid for out of state DVD XXX delivery for I'm not into intensive in person long girl selfish sex or even quickie looking just for a daddy type girl. I did consider rhyming divergent with Queen machine laundry detergent but doesn't that seem corny?

More
Evan Wessman (CinematicInceptions)
2017/07/09

This does not, in my opinion, qualify as a true dystopian movie/book. At it's core, it's a teen novel that rides the coattails of the Hunger Games, though in fairness, it is original enough not to be called a copy. But the focus is much more on the teen novel aspects of it with the young characters and the romantic storyline with Tris and Four. The dystopian aspects that the movie is named for is pretty shallow. A major point of dystopian fiction is to examine how the actions we are taking right now could affect the future if they are unchecked. Nothing of that nature is present in the regime of government regulated stereotyping. There are no points made or debates raised concerning what it means to be Divergent. Additionally, the strictness of conformity that was expected from the people was not made clear, which I disliked, but I guess that shows how important it is to the story.A major place where it lacked was its weak protagonist. Tris and Four are Divergents, and yet they have very little personality. Tris didn't feel like someone who is different. Honestly, she comes off as one of the most normal and colorless characters I've ever seen. She definitely has the least personality out of any of the other characters she interacts with. She has nothing driving her, and while that may be understandable for someone in her position, that's not the kind of person I'm going to root for. Now, part of that is probably because this was first a book, and that means that Tris' personality could be revealed to readers through her own thoughts instead of "character moments". I haven't read the book, but I've read Hunger Games, and I there were a couple of moments and shots that felt like they were trying to translate some of Tris' little interior monologues visually. It didn't help that Shaline Woodly gave a stiff performance that was comprised in large part of her gaping into the camera every few minutes. The other characters had some more personality and a couple had evident beliefs or motivations, but none of them were believable. Now, I don't want to slam on the movie too hard, because it held my attention the whole time and was adequately entertaining, which counts for something. There were enough interesting and active scenes to keep me interested, and there was some good technical work done on it. The action was fine, but there was a problem with people handling injuries a little too well. Tris gets shot in the leg and then is walking on it just fine a few minutes later, and Jeanine seems largely unaffected by the knife that goes *through her hand*. Probably the most striking thing about the movie was the sound mixing. I don't know why that stood out to me, but there was a lot of intensity created by the blending of the score and the other sounds of the movie. However insignificant that may be, it speaks to how unremarkable the rest of the movie was. There was nothing special about the characters, plot, or the world that was created. Yeah, it looked nice, but that doesn't really make up for the fact that it was essentially a pretty bland movie. It was like somebody made an amazingly well-cooked loaf of Wonder bread; as good as it is, it's still Wonder bread so there's only so good it can be. So I won't recommend this one way or the other. If you liked Hunger Games, yeah, you'll like this, but I think this is a couple steps down from that. But don't feel like you're missing out if you haven't seen it. Overall Rating: 7.2/10

More
Watch Instant, Get Started Now Watch Instant, Get Started Now