Watch The Last Kiss For Free

Beautiful, moving film.

A Masterpiece!

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

If you haven't the original Italian movie this is based on, do yourself a favor and watch it instead of this. If you already have watched the remake, you can still go and revisit the story which is handled way better. Of course you will feel differently about the Remake and like it much more than my rating is suggesting at the moment. But if you take my advise you might see where I'm going with this.While Zach and others are doing a decent job, you'd expect the movie to capture the essence way better than it actually does. If you have seen Garden State you might even be disappointed by the lack of effort (or at least it feels like a lack). Relationships are hard work, remakes are even harder work ... or not

"The Last Kiss" had a lot of potential, at least judging from the trailer and the synopsis. I love this movie genre and I liked "Garden State", so I decided to give this a try, but, unfortunately, I was extremely disappointed almost from the beginning.I have read a lot of reviews saying that this movie portraits life as it is for couples in their late twenties, but I just could not feel the connection. According to this script, all women are either shameless, needy or simply maniac while all men seem immature and stupid.First, I don't know a lot of women who would flirt openly with a complete stranger at a wedding and then still encourage any type of connection after they know he had a girlfriend. I have read many people who feel sorry for Kim's character, but, really, what could she expect? This doesn't mean that Michael was right in any way, shape or form, but their connection seems just too forced and unreal. Unfortunately, it was the main plot of the movie, so it fails flat right there.Second, what was the point of that awful scene where Jenna starts freaking out and screaming at Izzy's house right after his father dies just because she thinks her boyfriend MIGHT be cheating on her? How can Jenna be described as the "perfect" girlfriend at any point, really? I can only see a needy, self-centred, immature and maniac brat. God forbid if that is the definition of a perfect girlfriend! What type of "good" person would be so disrespectful? Wouldn't it make a little more sense to leave and wait for your boyfriend to come back and then talk things over in private? What good does it make to scream your heart out, act like you have just run away from a mental hospital and threaten your boyfriend with a knife? Maybe it's just me, but, especially considering that she was pregnant, wouldn't it be preferable to break things up if they were not working any more and, I don't know, maybe think a bit more of the well-being of her child? I don't know a lot of people who would react like that in real life, and even if they would, I'm certain they would never have been universally praised as "perfect".Considering her mother also acts like a teenage girl even though she seems to be well into her 60s, maybe the point of the movie is really just to show how the world is a difficult place when you're a spoilt brat.All in all, I didn't feel this movie was realistic in any way. In real life, people try to deal with their problems as well as they know. Of course they screw up and make mistakes, but, at least from my experience, they either sit down and talk about or accept that things can't be fixed and move on with their lives as best as possible. That is what being an adult means, I think.Here you look at a series of characters who have no idea what they are doing and seem to insist on being miserable for no particular reason. Perhaps that was exactly the point of the movie and there are a lot of people who can relate to it, but I just couldn't relate to it.

last time, I said famous black "saint" Sir sidney poitier should give those stupid young guys a good lesson about life and love..now I 'm afraid, our dear, honorable, respected Sir needs to come out again for another teach....the people in this movie mostly are ugly. the three guys Michael,Izzy, Kenny are obnoxiously ugly looking,Chris a pretty boy but a token gay(the director let you guess, though he got away from PC board himself) Marley Shelton is good looking but her screen time is too short. Blythe Danner, phenomenally gorgeous screen mom wastes pathetically.the guys in this movie suck the hell though most of them are over 30, still dress ,act ,talk like 20. all they can do is to be like slackers..their clothes are dirty, their personal hygiene is disgusting and dangerous(actually not their problem, they are still kids, living with their dad and mom)for the acting, Zach Braff probably did least lousy among the guys, but what a isosceles trapezoid looking ugly face!! with "albino" looking eyes. must be a loser in real life..watching those people who are less intelligent, less attractive, less moral than myself in cinema is so painful.well,sidney , take any girl you want..I know you will take good care of her, your words are not needed, I trust you.

This film is a pretty stereotypical, 20-something friends "come-of-manhood in marriage, relationships with women and selves" sort of film, loosely inspired by woody Allen marital dramatics and ruminations on extra-marital affairs. It probably only gathered the money to be made on the strength of leading man Zach braff's garden state success, but in this movie is acting is pretty much exactly as it was in that movie: wooden, awkward. This film however has no storyline about a childhood of lithium-induced emotional deadness or over-prescription on drugs to rationalize that, though.Film has a pretty good cast - even features drama between an older couple. But generally the plot is unrealistic and poorly written. A lot of the plot devices seemed poorly thought of, like someone based this on an idea they had while eating a bagel, or it was based on real-life events, but re-done around some do-it-yourself screen writing guide's tips on structure and etc. And the ending is terrible. It just all seems like it wouldn't really happen - Rachel bilson's horny co-ed is especially bad. 'oh no, Zach braff has gone to a crazy college party. he's lusting for this girl, but afraid of this world. he should just stick with his wife.' thats how it begins, and little changes. Jacinda Barret gives it her all as Zach's wife, but frankly, her scenes are painfully bad to watch. but at least tom Wilkinson has a cool accent, standing in for Ian holm as father figure. Also, weird bad soundtrack.However, why did I watch this movie? Two reasons, one called Casey affleck and one called Michael weston. Michael weston, well-remembered as the insane hitch-hiker who tortures Michael C. Hall in Six Feet Under, has his usual crazy presence and is always fun to watch perform. His story is endearing and sympathetic. Casey Affleck, an actor who's been really coming into his own lately, is great - his role, I believe, is the most believable, and thus his ending is the most painfully dissatisfying and irritating. But maybe in years to come this film will be remembered by people wanting to watch young Casey.6/10, barely above 5, doesn't really deserve to be watched unless you're totally bored and alone and have literally NOTHING to do but watch this on HBO.