Watch Amateur Porn Star Killer 2 For Free

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Sadly Over-hyped

I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.

It’s fine. It's literally the definition of a fine movie. You’ve seen it before, you know every beat and outcome before the characters even do. Only question is how much escapism you’re looking for.

The point in creating a physiological thriller, intended to make someone think or believe its real it's something that should be filmed in 3 hours in a friends basement with an actress that isn't fooling anyone.If the (and I personally feel ashamed to call him such) director wanted to make a film that was anything less then complete garbage he could have invested in a tripod. As far as people who create actual videos like this. (no not in porn in real life) They would put the camera down on a table or something so see everything that went on in order to view it later, and please lets not get into the terrible plot of the three movies where this 'rapist' changes his targeted age group for no reason..Aside from bashing the stupidity of who ever let him film this and the poor editing job, terrible angles most of which you cant even see what is going on or wear its taking place due to his Parkinsons disease with the camera, I rate this a do not buy, watch rent or even think about downloading, It's a waste of time and anyone who has anything good to say about this waste of tape needs to Higher their standards.

Much the same set-up as the original, Amateur Porn Star Killer, but quite a different film due to the absence of the 'little girl' element and the introduction of a more knowing and initially complicit 'victim'. Difficult to watch but hypnotic nevertheless with its crazy editing and beguiling images. Here the lady in tow is clearly up for some rough sex and Kai Lanette gives an amazingly believable performance. The flashbacks to previous rapes and killings continually disrupt the 'main event' but contribute to the 'realness' and force us to struggle to stay with the reprehensible but irresistible continuing action. Much more explicit than the first and unlike others I don't have a problem with that. Sure a film can be made without nudity and a film involving sex without hardcore but give the man a break if he wants to show some sex with his violence, this simply makes it even more realistic for me.

These are disturbing movies (in a good way). The first is better in the way that originals usually are: small, innovative and original.ASPK2 is good. Ryan has come a long way in marrying visuals and audio (I've seen his early work), and the flashbacks and broader scope of Brandon works well here.I wasn't completely sure the sex was real in the first film. I heard it was, thought I saw things... and in this one there is no denying it. I literally almost puked when Brandon continues to rape the girl after she's dead (complete with genital close ups). This fact is what knocks these movies down for me. Telling an engaging story, masterfully pulling you into what often seems real, while making strong social comments only to undermine it all with real sex? Aside from boosting DVD sales, I don't see the point. The real sex cheapens everything.The girl's hair could've been covering what was seen while her head bobbed; angles and thrusts could've replaced penetration shots. The fact you made these choices makes me question your motivation and in the least blurs (if not obliterates) what you're trying to say.I don't have a problem with a movie about a serial killer videoing how he humiliates, rapes and murders young women. I enjoy the approach and the presentation is wonderful. I just see no need for real sex.Shane, these are decent movies (minus real sex), and you've shown yourself to be a talented filmmaker... you're better than you are allowing yourself to be.Despite this and my deep-rooted objection to your choice for real sex, I am glad to see a fellow UGF person from back in the day doing well. I just hope that in the future you challenge yourself by not taking such a low road (not in the subject matter or story, but choices like sex).If it wasn't a smut film pretending to be a snuff film, I'd give it 7.

If you're looking for the worst "movie" ever made, look no further- this is it. And I suspect part I is just as bad or worse. This movie comes in two DVD versions, the "movie" version and the "snuff" version. The snuff version is the straight forward dirtier version. The movie version has some extraneous material. Both are equally bad. And both have XXX material in there so why there are two versions makes no sense. This thing looks like some guy and his girlfriend decided to film some abuse tape on their VGA cell phone camera, complete with cheesy cell phone coloring effects. The guy who supposedly is some deviant rapist killer picks up a girl at a donut shop, talks her into having sex, takes her to a room, there's some stupid back and forth talk that goes on forever, they start having sex, he gets rough and rougher, she leaves, he talks her into coming back, they go back at it and he chokes her to death. That's it. And trust me, it sounds far more interesting than it is. The movie version has a lot of text flashing on the screen about the killers past and how dangerous he is; the intro is of someone filming girls' behinds at a beach. This is filmed hand-held point-of-view so what you get to see is mostly the girls face and they guy's arm pulling her hair and pushing her around, while he improvises some lame porn-tape dialogue. How a distributor picks up stuff like this is a mystery. There is nothing in here worth seeing, not a single minute. This isn't horror, or scary, or twisted or perverse, ground-braking, or shocking. It's just mind-numbingly dumb.