Watch Souls at Sea For Free

Touches You

To me, this movie is perfection.

One of my all time favorites.

one of my absolute favorites!

I should begin by admitting a prejudice against sea-going tales. And, my interest in this film almost bit the dust because of that; I found the first 20 or so minutes of the film to be quite a bore.Then, however, the true nature of the tale began to become a bit more obvious, and my interest picked up. This is almost a spy story, albeit about a private effort to stop the lave trade.The cast here is interesting. The most interesting thing about Gary Cooper is that his speech pattern is not his usual. He does a nice job here. The role George Raft has here is totally different than just about anything you've seen him in before. Frances Dee is very good as the love interest and as the point of friction between her admirer (Cooper) and her brother (Henry Wilcoxon), a true slaver. I always thought that Wilcoxon was an actor who deserved better roles, and while he is the villain here, at least it's a good role. Harry Carey has a small role as a sea captain. Robert Cummings is here in his first movie role. Paul Fix has a tiny role as a violinist. Ward Bond and Alan Ladd have uncredited small roles.The shipwreck scenes are quite masterful (with a few glitches in special effects, but not bad for 1937).Highly recommended, just get past the first 20 minutes or so.

I was hoping for a melodrama instead, but the emphasis here is on the narrative rather than on action. But I am pleased to report that my headline is accurate, because "Souls At Sea" is a very interesting story about a subject barely touched upon in Hollywood's long, colorful history. Reading through other reviewers takes on the film, it qualifies more accurately as a semi-historical drama, although not the first story Hollywood has taken liberties with. The temptation is to call "Souls At Sea" a 'seafaring yarn', but, as I said, it is heavy on talk and light on second unit work.In any case, this offbeat movie has Gary Cooper faced with a moral dilemma as an abolitionist involved in the slave trade in the middle of the 19th century. His sidekick is George Raft, in as sympathetic a role as he ever had and one of his best acting jobs (never one of his strong points). Frances Dee is an ingenue on board the ship in question, and George Zucco plays a good guy for a change. Particularly effective is the background music which won an AA nomination for composer Milan Roder. Henry Wilcoxon is an effective bad guy and Olympe Bradna, whose film appearances were too few, is touching as a maidservant and love interest for George Raft. Very well done, as is the norm with a Henry Hathaway picture. The story is so absorbing that the viewer nearly forgets about the lack of action scenes, and is well worth my rating of seven.

I've never seen a bad movie by Henry Hathaway.It was the third time Gary Cooper had worked with this director after two classics "Lives of a Bengal lancer" and "Peter Ibbetson" ."Souls at sea' is perhaps not in the same league but it's an absorbing movie from start to finish.A long flashback,during a long trial,it casts George Raft against type as a romantic sailor who finds redemption by sacrificing himself.Cooper ,when he first appears is not as nice as in his other movies:working on a slave ship where the unfortunate prisoners are whipped to keep them from singing.But further acquaintance shows this:Cooper portrays an educated sailor who quotes Shakespeare ("to be or not to be" isn't it the question the slaves ask themselves?)and who remembers Homer ("beware of Greek presents" ).Can such a man be a slave trader? And can he sacrifice the others' life in order to save his own life during a wreck?;yes the movie includes a "Titanic" in miniature in which the violin plays on.Like in "Bengal lancer",Htahaway does not seem interested in the female character who is decorative,no more,no less.

Our memories of historic calamity is selective - from legend the great flood of Noah (and Gilgamesh), from Rome the eruption of Vesuvius over Pompeii and Herculaneum, from the middle ages the bubonic plague, from the Reformation the St. Bartholemew Day's Massacre, the Great fire of London in 1666, all the way to the Chicago fire, the San Francisco Earthquake, the sinking of the Titanic, the Hindenburg, the Holacaust of World War II, and a handful of others. No films about the Lusitania, the Andrea Doria, the Teneriffe Airplane catastrophe (the worst aviation disaster), the Wilhelm Gustloff, the eruption of Mt. Pelee in Martinique in 1902 (there is a book THE DAY THE WORLD ENDED, which was made into a movie - but the setting was modernized), or the great influeza epidemic of 1918. Occasionally a film briefly deals with a disaster: MANHATTAN MELODRAMA with the the General Slocum fire, or THE SEVEN LITTLE FOYS with the Iroquois Theatre fire. It is rare for a film to pick up and plant a tragedy squarely into the conclusion of a film.In 1842 a ship, the "William Brown", hit an iceberg and sank. The survivors faced a problem similar to the Titanic - there was only one lifeboat, and too many people to save. The Captain (Harry Carey Sr. in this movie) was injured and command went to the first mate. The mate (here played by Gary Cooper) had one of the most agonizing decisions any seaman faces: "Who will live and who must we allow to die?" He went about the grim business with determination, and about a dozen survivors died. The remaining survivors owed their lives to his decision - because he was able to keep the one lifeboat afloat by not overloading it with survivors. However, he was tried for murder, and convicted of manslaughter. The film changes this in several ways. First, the bulk of the film dealt with the slave trade, slowly being made illegal by the British and U.S. governments in the late 1830s and 1840s, but still supported strongly in the American South. Much of the film deals with Cooper and his friend George Raft fighting the slave interests (represented by Henry Wilcoxon - for once away from his usual director Cecil B. DeMille). Secondly, the disaster that culminates the film is caused by a fire set by a little girl (Virginia Weidler - who is killed in the initial explosion). The disaster is well handled, and gives Raft one of his most poignant moments when he takes the body of his girlfriend (who was killed in the disaster) and places the body on her bed in her stateroom, and goes down with the ship to remain with her. The actual choices of death or life is given by Cooper - and done well. Finally, the court does not convict Cooper, who is freed by the eloquence of his lawyer (George Zucco, of all people!). It is a good movie, and reminds the audience of how powerful an economic group the slavers were. Many American fortunes in the shipping trade did use slave ships for profit on occasion. In the 17th, 18th, and early 19th Century it was not considered an obnoxious trade until about 1828. Before condemning Americans for being so hypocritical, remember England did not finally abolish slavery until 1833 (just before the death of William Wilberforce, the man who led the abolitionist movement there for decades). Russia did not abolish it's variation - serfdom - until 1861, four years before the U.S. abolished it with the 13th Amendment, and Brazil did not abolish it until 1889! I might add that in portions of North Africa, it is still countananced by certain governments (like the Sudan). The latter detail does not get much attention in the press, interestingly enough.Why was the "William Brown" tragedy "lucky enough" to get a film of it's own? Why no film about the loss of H.M.S. Royal George (which keeled over with the loss of 900 people at anchor in Spitshead in 1782), or the Andrea Doria (surely an interesting film about the great rescue of 1,600 people on board is worth consideration)? Neither appears on celuloid (although photos and movies of the actual Doria disaster exist). But why the "Brown"? The trial does give the film a good culmination point, but the sinking has nothing to do with slavery or the slave trade!By the way, the story of the "Brown" was repeated in a modern setting in 1957, when Tyrone Power starred in "ABANDON SHIP!". Basically the story is kept the same - overcrowded lifeboat under command of the first mate (Power) when the Captain dies (here the Captain was Lloyd Nolan). The only difference was that Stephen Boyd was the one survivor who tries to stop Power. Power survives, but is put on trial and found guilty of manslaughter. Since his decisions are put into central view, the entire movie deals with the emotional problems Power faces in literal life and death choices. It is a terrific film, and one of Power's three or four best dramatic performances. Footnote to Power and his sea movie - Tyrone Power was the third of four generations of Powers after an initial ancester, also known as Tyrone Power, who made a huge reputation as a leading stage actor of the 1820s and 1830s in England and the United States. His great-grandfather was sailing home, in March 1841, on the largest Atlantic liner of the day: the President. It was last seen in a hurricane swept sea off Nantucket shoals. Nothing further was ever discovered of it. Many Americans found it a sinister coincidence that that April, for the first time in our history, the U.S. President (William Henry Harrison) died in office of pneumonia. Perhaps Tyrone Power thought of his missing forbear when he made ABANDON SHIP, that re-telling of the William Brown tragedy.