WATCH YOUR FAVORITE
MOVIES & TV SERIES ONLINE
TRY FREE TRIAL
Home > Adventure >

The Little Vampire

Watch The Little Vampire For Free

The Little Vampire

Based on the popular books, the story tells of Tony who wants a friend to add some adventure to his life. What he gets is Rudolph, a vampire kid with a good appetite. The two end up inseparable, but their fun is cut short when all the hopes of the vampire race could be gone forever in single night. With Tony's access to the daytime world, he helps them to find what they've always wanted.

... more
Release : 2000
Rating : 5.7
Studio : New Line Cinema, 
Crew : Art Direction,  Production Design, 
Cast : Jonathan Lipnicki Richard E. Grant Jim Carter Alice Krige Pamela Gidley
Genre : Adventure Fantasy Comedy Family

Cast List

Related Movies

Dr. No
Dr. No

Dr. No   1963

Release Date: 
1963

Rating: 7.2

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Sean Connery  /  Ursula Andress  /  Joseph Wiseman
From Russia with Love
From Russia with Love

From Russia with Love   1964

Release Date: 
1964

Rating: 7.3

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Goldfinger
Goldfinger

Goldfinger   1964

Release Date: 
1964

Rating: 7.7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Sean Connery  /  Gert Fröbe  /  Honor Blackman
Ben-Hur
Ben-Hur

Ben-Hur   1959

Release Date: 
1959

Rating: 8.1

genres: 
Adventure  /  Drama  /  Action
Stars: 
Charlton Heston  /  Stephen Boyd  /  Hugh Griffith
You Only Live Twice
You Only Live Twice

You Only Live Twice   1967

Release Date: 
1967

Rating: 6.8

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Sean Connery  /  Akiko Wakabayashi  /  Mie Hama
On Her Majesty's Secret Service
On Her Majesty's Secret Service

On Her Majesty's Secret Service   1969

Release Date: 
1969

Rating: 6.7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
George Lazenby  /  Diana Rigg  /  Telly Savalas
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone   2001

Release Date: 
2001

Rating: 7.6

genres: 
Adventure  /  Fantasy
Stars: 
Daniel Radcliffe  /  Rupert Grint  /  Emma Watson
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire   2005

Release Date: 
2005

Rating: 7.7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Fantasy
Stars: 
Daniel Radcliffe  /  Rupert Grint  /  Emma Watson
The Man with the Golden Gun
The Man with the Golden Gun

The Man with the Golden Gun   1974

Release Date: 
1974

Rating: 6.7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Roger Moore  /  Christopher Lee  /  Britt Ekland
The Spy Who Loved Me
The Spy Who Loved Me

The Spy Who Loved Me   1977

Release Date: 
1977

Rating: 7

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Roger Moore  /  Barbara Bach  /  Curd Jürgens
Manhattan
Manhattan

Manhattan   1979

Release Date: 
1979

Rating: 7.8

genres: 
Drama  /  Comedy  /  Romance
Stars: 
Woody Allen  /  Diane Keaton  /  Michael Murphy
Moonraker
Moonraker

Moonraker   1979

Release Date: 
1979

Rating: 6.2

genres: 
Adventure  /  Action  /  Thriller
Stars: 
Roger Moore  /  Lois Chiles  /  Michael Lonsdale

Reviews

Tuchergson
2018/08/30

Truly the worst movie I've ever seen in a theater

More
HeadlinesExotic
2018/08/30

Boring

More
BoardChiri
2018/08/30

Bad Acting and worse Bad Screenplay

More
Gurlyndrobb
2018/08/30

While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

More
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews
2008/02/17

I watched this on account of the TV-listings being too vague and featuring a somewhat loose translation(if it does capture the spirit)... yes, until the title card in the opening credits, I expected this to be My Friend Is A Vampire(on account of this being referred to as My Friend, The Vampire), an '88(the year, not the character of the second Dark Forces video-game... and yes, I admit that that was something of a stretch) film which I was ever-so-slightly more interested in. I decided to cut my losses and give this a chance. I have not regretted doing so. Granted, this is a children's film... very much so. A heavy reliance on the notion that all grown-ups are imbeciles and/or morons, material that no one above the age of ten could possibly find funny and writing that at times is utterly stupid and devoid of logic are all featured. The unendurable kid from Jerry Maguire has grown a handful of years older, not that you could tell(seriously, when he's 90, he's still going to look 4), and he's every bit as obnoxious, starring in this. The acting could stand definite improvement, for the most part. There is at least one bit of utterly unnecessary gross-out comedy, near the end, which lasts for minutes(if it isn't evident every second of those). Worst of all, this has a girl of eleven or twelve referencing To Have and Have Not, by delivering something much too close to Bacall's (in)famous line(but hey, maybe the kids won't get it, here's hoping). Check the Parent Guide for other censorship information. But while all that is certainly true, the film is far from unwatchable. The plot isn't too bad, and it develops reasonably well throughout(as well as makes fairly decent sense, for the genre, "family" film). The pacing is pretty spot-on, this moves just about as it's supposed to. The action parts are actually not too poorly done, and the character of Rookery is not without his cool moments. Some of the humor is downright funny, though it is mostly silly. The special effects vary, but tend to be on the positive side(and hey, it *is* an independent film). Richard E. Grant isn't bad at all. This really *could* be watched by just about anyone, and there is even a possibility that some of the generations/age groups may find themselves enjoying some of the same things in it. I recommend this to, well, anyone. There are many better films out there, and quite possibly better ones to watch with kids/parents, but you could certainly also do considerably worse. 6/10

More
callanvass
2003/12/09

i actually really enjoyed this it was pretty well made had awesome acting and the plot was really neat and it had stylish direction and some good visuals although not really a horror movie and mostly for kids i found this to be a entertaining little flick so rent it *** out of 5

More
eponine_13
2002/10/06

I loved this movie. I'm a sucker for movies that remind me of my younger years, and this is definitely one of them (well, seeing as it's made for kids, that's hardly surprising). The plot was good, the bad guy wasn't scary enough to give younger kids nightmares, but unlikable enough for the slightly older children not the care that he ISN'T too frightening. Wonderful costumes too.Did anyone notice the last name of the Vampires? Sackville-Bagg? It's freakishly close to that of the Sackville-Bagginses from Lord of the Rings...

More
Dia Klain
2001/10/10

This was a very nicely made movie. It was at times amusing and cute. It had wonderful costumes and decoration. Alright, so the acting wasn't the best and the empty `ahhhhhhhh's sometimes did irritate but, hay, Home Alone right? The plot was intricate and made the movie interesting. However I did not really enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I love vampires and anything mystical, so why? The bottom line is, (the fine bottom line that I neglected to pay attention to) that this movie is a kid movie not meant for 16 year old horny vamp lovers. Its childish manner just failed to satisfy. Things did not make sense. They happened as everyone knows they would not were it real. The `bad guy' was laughable. In other words, unless you are dreadfully immature and childish for your age, or are out to watch every single vampire movie out there, do not watch this one past 12, it will not do.

More
Watch Instant, Get Started Now Watch Instant, Get Started Now