Watch The I Inside For Free

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Very best movie i ever watch

i must have seen a different film!!

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Without spoiling anything, the plot of The I Inside really disappoints me.But it's still quite watchable. The blending of the stories is very well done. The main cast and supporting cast are excellent. The whole atmosphere is menacing and uncomfortable, in the right kind of way. And it's always nice to see Robert Sean Leonard in something. Even something that falls a bit flat, like this.Just wish they had sat down and worked it out properly before they started making it.I'd say watch it if you have nothing else to, it won't wreck your day.But it could have been so much more.

I inside takes a shot at a very hard target and unfortunately misses. I was curious why i haven't seen this movie as i enjoy the genre very much, and i was suspicious why the low rating. The movie feels like someone tried very hard to prepare it 'by the recipe' but like in cooking for the first time by following a recipe - the meal is edible, but not that enjoyable. It starts good as you can rarely miss on the first few ingredients and then the errors start piling up. Some scenes are predictable, others just have some illogical elements. As the story unfolds it is disappointingly failing to gradually become better. The drama that is presented in the story didn't mirror correctly on the characters. The main characters were having difficulties defining themselves and their shifting morals. Don't get me wrong i did enjoy this movie i just am a big fan if this genre and can be thus a bit more criticizing. There aren't that many movies of this type, so i am actually very glad to have seen it.

This is like seeing a good runner giving his best efforts while running to later be stopped because someone out of the blue crosses his path causing him to lose the race or get in the second or third place. You feel bad for that kind of situation. Just like the runner "The I Inside" begins with lot of promise to later become uninteresting and dull, almost laughable at parts.It got me completely hooked at first but then little by little the lack of suspense prevented the movie from being nice to follow and the confusion towards the ending messed up the whole thing big time. It's fun to give it a shot at the life of a man (Ryan Phillippe) who after an accident wakes up from the coma, barely remembering anything, developing the strange ability to go back and forth between the space of two years. But he needs to fill the gaps in his mind: What really happened to him? Who are these people surrounding me? I'm married? Did I killed my brother? There's plenty of mystery to be solved before he loses his mind. And it gets better when he realizes his power to in between the years to change his past and his future (or maybe recollect his memories in another way). By the time you reach the ending "The I Inside" is no longer appealing. It had great potential but got lost somewhere. One of the writers was the same one who wrote the amazing "Identity" with John Cusack and a great cast involved in a mysterious and surprising plot with a twisted ending that haunts me for years. Sure, there's a huge plot twist in this too but it's so ineffective that only causes small reactions in the audience. Luckily, the cast doesn't disappoint and it's a miracle seeing Stephen Lang playing a good guy for once.All I can say is that "The Butterfly Effect" was way better than this. 4/10

This movie does not get the credit it deserves, in my opinion. Cooney wrote something beautiful in this script. He brought upon questions and ideas subject to us, and approached it in a manner that keeps us guessing – keeps us curious. Cooney is not a philosopher, he is a film writer: he is simply doing what he does best in life, and in my opinion with great merit. We have seen this theme before, and even after this film (The Butterfly Effect), but that does not give any reason why Cooney should not take his stab at it. Pure originality is few and far between these days, maybe even non-existent. As for the directing: nothing bad to say. There is some great camera work, cinematography and use of effects. There were some beautifully placed dark and gloomy scenes, and a wonderful recreation of the act of dying and being brought back to life (exactly the way my grandfather described it to me when it happened to him... not to say that each resuscitation isn't unique and individual, but we do hear of a common trend: see the white light; see your body below you).My only real problem with the film is that I think Piper Perabo was slightly overacting. Not that the acting did not fit in some way, but it seemed a tad dry and much, but this is a subjective outlook. Others may find her fitting.******** SPOILER ******** DO NOT READ UNLESS YOU HAVE WATCHED THE FILMConsider what the orderly said (and I'm paraphrasing): how and why people die is the question. It may be the only question.I am writing this comment not to be audacious or to act superior, but I feel I have read a few other unintelligent comments that brought me to be motivated to say my piece. What some people do not realize, or have yet to realize, is that the story is about a man who is at the edge of death. Some people in this world die, but have a chance to be resuscitated – some people come back to us, some don't. Consider those who do survive. Why is it they live and other before them did not? The same tools and similar (maybe even the same) circumstances are at their temptation. Maybe those who died gave up, and those who lived still had something important to live for. This is Simon Cable. Now, of course, there are holes in this hypothesis: is this important calling of God (Peter seems to think otherwise at the end: we decide), there are those who come back to us without amnesia (but at the end, does Simon not go back to where he once was, unaware and unknowing once again), and does this make him insane (the old cliché that the insane are truly those best in touch with the world). The last idea I don't personally believe, but this movie is about the questions. It doesn't end in obscurity or lose its' intelligence, it simply explores an idea and leaves us wondering: how and why do people die? And is this phenomenon even more than we, as believers of our own trend, realize.Though the rating of a movie to simply overall 1 to 10 can be difficult, and I am still on the fence of how much I like it (having just seen it, and would like to come back to it a few weeks from now). I gave it an 8, though I think a 7.5 would be more accurate to my opinion at this moment.