Watch Dragons of Camelot For Free

Absolutely brilliant

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

Great story, amazing characters, superb action, enthralling cinematography. Yes, this is something I am glad I spent money on.

Well, maybe I had higher hopes for this one than I should have had. I mean the film isn't completely awful but it's not good. I'd say this is a film to watch ONLY IF there is zero else to watch or do.This story takes place right when King Arthur dies, Morgana takes over Camelot, Lancelot was banished and both Merlin & Guenevere are imprisoned - the rest of the knights must save Guenevere, Merlin and Camelot. It's new take on the old tale.I will give them an "E" for Effort, they took the film seriously and did the best they were able to do on a small budget. I normally love quite a few of the "B" films - but this one gets a bit boring (that is my reason for not rating it higher).4/10

Shame I cannot give it zero.It was partly funny for the first 10 minutes I put up with it.A cast of few. Terrible, atrocious acting. If you have to watch it insist that you are paid to do so and tied to your chair. That is the only way you will get through it.The plastic bendy swords are worth watching out for tho, that did give me a chuckle.Don't waste your time or money.Polish your shoes or,Wash your hair

First of all the "dramatic" acting with pointing fingers and hands, the body language of the actors was horrible. The plot simple and everything foreseeable. Let me put it this: I watched about five minutes of the movie and I thought, it might be a children's movie. Or grown-ups with simple minds. I don't want to waste more than these five minutes on the "movie". The fighting was awful.. some people running with their swords and looking into the air. Every movement or expression on their faces was just exaggeration.. if someone looked angry, it was REALLY angry looking, to show he was angry... I think it was acting from the twenties, when people didn't have much experience with movies and everything had to be theatrical to show what really was meant. I'm glad I didn't pay for this movie, but wasted only a few minutes of my life to this crap.

This would have have to be one of the worst movies i have ever wasted my time watching. The battle scenes ? 12 people on each side. Was the budget for this film $100 or less.Don't waste your time on this,The acting is awful and no name stars. Why do people waste money making such Crap.The cgi looks like someone cut and pasted Castles onto pictures in the background.The editing is also dreadful.Please watch something else, don't waste you time on this film. If the actors got paid for this it was a scam. The sets looked like they where made of Foam rubber. Just awful.