Watch Fatal Reunion For Free

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Too much of everything

The Worst Film Ever

Save your money for something good and enjoyable

2 votes for David Millbern and Michael Bergin as the two leading men in this silly empty headed nonsensical TV movie starring my least favorite actress, Erika Eleniak. Look like a whore, dress like a whore, you are a whore. This vacant woman (Eleniak, now a blond) thinking her husband (Millbern) is seeing another woman, goes out on the town with an old flame (Bergin) leading him on. Of course, proved wrong, she decides to end the romance, even though they only had one luncheon date. Now get this. She shows up at a pre-invited dinner to tell him she doesn't want to see him anymore. She shows up in this very low cut ensemble, baring her breasts as much as TV allows, one of Eleniak's trademarks. You see, her claim to fame is large bosoms. When he acts confused she slams the door in his face and the rest is history. Someone is stalking her. We don't know who till the end. By then, who cares anyway. Another loser in this horror film is a friend played by horsey mouth Sonya Salomaa. If you can remember that far back, she played the dip-so in another loser TV film Ties That Bind, about another dip-so using a married couple's guest house for evil purposes. My feeling is the male roles should have been reversed. For certainly Bergin would be better as the husband and Millbern the suitor. A waste of an evening except to watch the guys do some decent work. While the women run around with their brains on empty.

The movie is basically like any daytime soap opera. The writing is what I imagine a 13 year old girl would come up with. The acting was okay in a soap opera kind of way meaning middle of the road.The director, George Erschbamer, has made all sorts of trash like this. I'm pretty sure all these 'movies' shot in Vancouver are some sort of tax write-off scheme for wealthy or semi-wealthy individuals to horde money. Why would you make such terrible films unless you were making them with the intention to purposely lose money? I'm very curious about how this racket works. I'd like to get in on it myself one day because they're obviously making money at it.

On occasion, even the big mega-buck films, with A-list stars and 9-figure budgets, have to contain ridiculously silly omissions to further the plot.But it seems that these "Lifetime," stories, with far from A-list-staffed personnel, do this about 95% of the time.Here, about a hundred or so words of clarification and conversation between the two leads could have precluded all of this nonsense. Of course, then the contact between Laura and her sociopathic former classmate would have been precluded, and the story would have ended after 15 minutes or so. Incidentally, if this had occurred, and they would have just shown a test pattern for the last 100 minutes, it would have been about as entertaining.Russell is a hard-working ad executive/husband, and wife Jessica feels he's cheating from things she has heard, from her stilted observations, and inferences drawn from his erratic, often late work schedule.But for cripes sake, a one-minute conversation between them, and the fore-mentioned 100 words, could have informed her of the fact that he was on the verge of concluding a deal which would have them all set for life, necessitating long hours and occasioning dining with an attractive woman (about which she'd heard from one of her equally-shallow friends).Even this vacuous woman should have understood that. Hubby could have offered a few words of explanation of his own volition, but frankly, the hot -shot ad exec pretty much matched her in the "vacuous" department.So enter the sociopathic former classmate, and his equally (or more) sociopathic companion, and you now have twice the number of vacuous personages on-screen, a story which a challenged 12-year-old could predict, and a whole slew of characters about whom one couldn't care less.(Incidentally, after Jessica initially meets Marcus, and he - purporting to be a big-deal real estate mogul, invites her to dinner - where she chortles about this upcoming assignation with her friends, the dialog here is something which would make the conversations among the nerdy teens in the old beach blanket flicks seem like something highly-intellectual by comparison. And the inevitable brandishing of various weaponry at the conclusion could have been culled from any number of Lifetime "sociopath-menaces-innocent-family" past presentations.)

I completely agree with stanfloyd about this movie. It has nothing to redeem it. The acting, writing, cinematography, everything is awful. I think you were generous to give it a 2! My husband and I had nothing to do today and were tired so we sat down to watch something mindless. We found it. This was about as mindless as it gets. It was extremely predictable. The minute the "lawyer" walked in we knew something was up with her. I said right away, "are you guys going to check her out?" Of course, no. It isn't until after they decide to go along with her crazy plan that he suddenly thinks something might be fishy. And right from the beginning I had no sympathy for Jess. She was an idiot.