WATCH YOUR FAVORITE
MOVIES & TV SERIES ONLINE
TRY FREE TRIAL
Home > Documentary >

Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?

Watch Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? For Free

Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?

Were the Apollo moon landings faked?

... more
Release : 2001
Rating : 5.4
Studio : 20th Century Fox Television, 
Crew : Director,  Writer, 
Cast : Mitch Pileggi
Genre : Documentary

Cast List

Related Movies

Die Mütter-Mafia
Die Mütter-Mafia

Die Mütter-Mafia   2014

Release Date: 
2014

Rating: 5.8

genres: 
Comedy  /  Romance
Stars: 
Annette Frier  /  Tim Bergmann  /  Chiara Schoras
Dear Prudence
Dear Prudence

Dear Prudence   2008

Release Date: 
2008

Rating: 5.8

genres: 
Drama  /  Mystery  /  TV Movie
Stars: 
Jane Seymour  /  Jamey Sheridan  /  Ryan Cartwright
The Birds II: Land's End
The Birds II: Land's End

The Birds II: Land's End   1994

Release Date: 
1994

Rating: 3.3

genres: 
Horror  /  TV Movie
Stars: 
Brad Johnson  /  Chelsea Field  /  James Naughton
Thomas Hart Benton
Thomas Hart Benton

Thomas Hart Benton   1989

Release Date: 
1989

Rating: 7.2

genres: 
Documentary
Stars: 
Jason Robards  /  Edward R. Murrow  /  Burl Ives

Reviews

Cortechba
2018/08/30

Overrated

More
SeeQuant
2018/08/30

Blending excellent reporting and strong storytelling, this is a disturbing film truly stranger than fiction

More
ChampDavSlim
2018/08/30

The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

More
Staci Frederick
2018/08/30

Blistering performances.

More
splumer
2016/06/14

Rather than refuting the "evidence" that they claim prove that the Moon landings were hoaxes, I would just ask you: if this "evidence" is so obvious, don't you think NASA would have figured these issues out? This "documentary" doesn't even allow NASA to rebut all these arguments; they have one spokesperson, who seems like he was blindsided by these questions. They have the dude who designed the cameras for Hasselblad that were used on the Moon missions, but they ask him space questions, not photography questions. So much for actual experts.My biggest single beef, though, is the Bill Kaysing. They present him as "an engineer who worked on the space program," yet by his own admission (in his book) he is neither an engineer nor a scientist. He's hardly one to say NASA "couldn't" have gotten to the Moon.In short, this is a deceptive, dishonest piece of garbage that, rather than examining legitimate questions (such as surviving the Van Allen belts) and getting actual answers from actual scientists, they present conspiracy kooks. Please don't waste your time watching this. I regret watching even a minute of this.

More
Scars_Remain
2008/08/16

The general public will, of course, not accept this film because it goes against what they have been told for their entire lives. I've seen a lot of people say how the arguments in this film are irrelevant or just plain stupid but I haven't seen any of them explain why. You can bash it all you want, but I'd like to hear you back it up.I felt that the evidence and arguments were interesting and convincing. I guess I should make it clear that I believe both sides are possible so I'm open to either one. I really liked how this film was done and how it left me feeling. Is it really possible that NASA could have fooled us all into thinking that they went to moon but actually didn't? I think so. You'll have to decide for yourself.

More
dead jester
2005/10/17

Why are you all so determined to slate the show? Does it not seem reasonable that the American Government is lying again, they do lie about most things you know! With all the conjecture about "did we?" or "didn't we?" No body has thought about what the Government of a nation is capable of... Threatening, killing, destroying, lying, hiding... etc.It's obvious to even the very dim that the video footage and all its evidence is fake. It does NOT mean that there was no Moon landing though. It IS possible to land on the moon (even then), but those bits of evidence from NASA were faked in order to show what couldn't be shown for real (due to technology issues). Some of those pictures were most probably 'touched up' to show detail. Since NASA had already denied this, they would lose face if the truth came out. So they continue to deny. As for: No stars, no engine plume, no crater, flag moves... These are explained through simple means (as mentioned in earlier posts). It does, however, raise other questions, like... Who filmed the ascent? Or, why evidence suddenly goes missing after its authors death, which could prove or dis-prove this whole debate? THINK BEFORE YOU RANT AND WAVE YOUR FLAG!So instead of slagging those whom know the difference between fake and real pictures/film. Remember, they would also be happily proved wrong. Fox are bound to issue a rebuttal. Wouldn't you, if the Government threatened you? They are known for it after all.

More
Conrad_QS
2005/10/08

Finally, someone saw the problems from that hoax. And show us the facts only. The answer from spatial agency? Not only in the documentary, but in general was a big denial with no explanations. You are not convinced? Watch the documentary! You will not regret that! Another thing: they said that one ship was sent to scan the moon surface. That ship, search over the internet to convince yourself, has disappeared with no reason. Another coincidence? I think not. Just watch the movie and tell me if i am wrong! And tell other people, to inform what "great" job was done and how a full world was foolish with that hoax. The people who put a rating of 1 are, i'm almost sure, influenced by "you know who"... but that is less important. WATCH THE MOVIE, IF YOU CAN STILL FIND IT!

More
Watch Instant, Get Started Now Watch Instant, Get Started Now