Watch Westbound For Free

Sadly Over-hyped

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

While the western genre is not my favourite one of all film genres (not sure which one is my favourite due to trying to appreciate them all the same), there is a lot of appreciation for it by me. There are a lot of very good to great films, with the best work of John Ford being notable examples.In the late 50s, starting in 1956 with 'Seven Men from Now' and right up to 1960 with 'Comanche Station', lead actor Randolph Scott collaborated with director Budd Boetticher in seven films. For me, 1959's 'Westbound' is one of their weakest along with 'Decision at Sundown'. By all means it is a long way from terrible, it has a lot of great elements and is actually pretty decent. It just isn't in the same league as the wonderful 'Seven Men from Now', 'The Tall T' and 'Ride Lonesome' and doesn't have enough of what made those two so good, they had far better scripts and characterisation in particular as well as better supporting casts.Starting with the strengths, while not the best-looking of their outings, being smaller in scale and slightly too compact in its setting, 'Westbound' still looks pleasing. It is very nicely filmed, with some nice colour and atmosphere, and handsomely designed, it just lacks the visual grandeur of their best collaborations. The music, wonderfully perky and one of the best scores of the Scott/Boetticher western films, has presence and fits perfectly, while not being intrusive.Boetticher directs efficiently and mostly the film goes at a pace that isn't pedestrian. Numerous parts are suspenseful and fun, with some well choreographed action. The ending is effective. Scott brings likeability, charisma and intensity to his role and he is well supported by Karen Steele, oozing glamour, class and charm in the far better written of the female roles, and the wonderfully arch Michael Pate.However, the rest of the supporting cast are pretty feeble, definitely the weakest supporting cast of the Scott/Boetticher westerns. Virginia Mayo is wasted with hardly anything to do in a nothing role. Andrew Duggan's charisma-free performance is just as weak, liked him in 'Decision at Sundown' so what happened.The script, very like that for 'Decision at Sundown', is too wordy, lacking the meat and tautness of the scripts of the best Scott/Boetticher films, and can preach and be too basic. There is not enough depth to the characters, with only Scott's hero being developed enough and even then his motivation should have been explored more and more gripping. Mayo's role is especially sketchy and could have been written out. The story has a lot of great moments, but there is also some credibility straining, overload of simplicity and lack of tautness.Altogether, decent but had the potential to be much better. 6/10 Bethany Cox

My review title is a quote from star Randolph Scott, as Union Captain John Hayes, addressing a Confederate-sympathizing cook who poured much salt into the pie slice of the lone blue coat among a group seated at the table in his restaurant. The cook claims this pie slice is no different from the others, but it's obvious this is a lie, raising Hayes' ire. This immediately reminded me of a similar episode with the same quote said by Richard Cramer: the menacing skipper of a small boat that Laurel and Hardy are trapped on, in "Saps at Sea". He's ordered them to make him a dinner, knowing that there is no food on board.Despite director Budd Beotticher's prejudice of wanting to be minimally associated with this low budget quickie Warnercolor Civil War western, it's quite an entertaining yarn, with a plot along the lines of the Missouri-Kansas border wars, only this is sited in the little frontier town of Julesburg, in the NE corner of then Colorado Territory. Located not far off the Oregon-California trail, historically, Julesburg was a major center for the Overland stage company, as portrayed in the film. However, the major plot features of Julesburg being a hotbed of Confederate sympathizers and the Overland stage transporting the bulk of California gold eastward are fictional. The great bulk of CA and NV gold and silver was transported by ships, not stages, to the East. Perhaps the screenwriters were unaware that the Colorado Rockies and SW Montana were also major gold producers during much of the Civil War. These would have been much more likely sources of gold shipments east by stage than CA gold!Not only do we get lead Randy Scott, still looking and acting virile at age 60, but two gorgeous classy blonds in Virginia Mayo and Karen Steele. Name another western that can equal that! Initially, both are married, but both husbands die as a result of gunslinger Mace's ambition to shoot Hayes. They then become potential rivals for the attention of the unmarried Hayes. Virginia was a decade older, nearing 40, and had been the female star in a number of westerns over the years, most recently "Ft. Dobbs". Although she is billed over Karen, Karen is given more screen time and is characterized as the 'good' girl, with a suggestion of at least an intermittent relationship with Hayes, in the end. Off camera, it was married Beotticher who was romancing Karen, which no doubt explains her greater presence in the film than Virginia and her starring role in several other Beotticher-Scott films. Quite the independent woman she sometimes portrayed in her films, she didn't marry until her 40s. In contrast to Karen's tomboy rancher character, Virginia plays the gold-digging kept trophy wife of wealthy Confederate sympathizer Clay Putnum. Complicating things, before the war, she was romantically involved with Hayes. It's soon clear that her marriage to Putnum is largely loveless and that she still loves Hayes. Although Virginia was mostly cast in minimally demanding roles as a classy pretty face, as in this film, she could convincingly play a rustic tomboy wildcat, as in "Along the Great Divide": my favorite of her film characters.You may wonder why the film is titled "Westbound", when the main point of the story is the shipment of California gold eastward? It refers to Hayes' initial journey westward to Julesburg from a military unit in the East. Not coincidentally, Julesburg was Hayes' hometown, he previously being the manager of the Overland stage there. The army is sending him back, as the present manager(Putnum) seems unable to stop depredations by Confederate sympathizers on the gold-laden stages in this region. The reason turns out to be that he, like most people in and around this town, is a southern sympathizer. Putnum is actually the most interesting character in this film, although Duggan lacks charisma. He wants to stop the gold shipments by sabotage: mostly stealing horses and burning down way stations, but wants to avoid any killings. In this latter respect , he is in deep conflict with his loose canon hired gun, Mace, who seems to also be the leader of Putnum's gang of thugs. Mace is more interested in stealing gold than in preventing its travel through this region. He takes an immediate dislike to Hayes upon the latter's arrival, and provides a dramatic demonstration of his marksmanship in shooting off Hayes' holster with gun after Hayes refuses to respond to his implied gun duel challenge. Mace later accidentally kills Karen's husband: one-armed union soldier Rod Miller, mistaking him for Hayes. He is also responsible for the deaths of a whole stage full of passengers, when the stage careens down a steep slope after the driver is shot dead. This is the final straw in the relationship between Putnum and Mace, as well as Putnum's marriage to Virginia. Putnum is shot dead by Mace as he races to try to save Hayes from being ambushed by Mace. Hayes then shoots Mace as he tries to escape from a surprise counter-ambush by a committee of citizens angered by the recent killings. Virginia decides to flee this region rather than try to patch things up with Hayes, leaving the field open for widowed Karen.Yes, this film is at least as good as most of the other Beottricher-Scott films I have seen, regardless of Boettricher's prejudice. Wally Brown and Fred Sherman , as the colorful stage drivers, provide a bit of diversion from the serious drama. The photography is beautiful and traveling music pleasant. Presently available on DVD.

This is a decent western—how could it not be since it stars Randolph Scott, always a cowboy who could make you believe it. Here he's a cavalry officer charged with getting gold shipments back east for the Union war effort. Trouble is there are Southern sympathizers in town, including his romantic rival (Duggan) and the hired gunsel (Pate); on the other hand, Scott's only help is a one-armed ex-Union soldier and his eye-catching wife (Dante & Steele).Most of the action occurs in town or at the stagecoach way station, but we do get some well-chosen scenic shots in Warner Color. Also, Dante makes a likable ally for Scott, as he shows us how to fire a rifle with only one hand; at the same time, he and Scott play off one another really well. However, Mayo's role looks like an inessential add-on, maybe for marquee value.Unfortunately, that final shootout is not up to Boetticher's usual standards— for example, Mace (Pate) looks like he wants to get shot, standing in the middle of the street as bullets fly. Speaking of the versatile Michael Pate, he seems to have been in about every sage opera of the period. But then he's got such a different look, so well suited to playing baddies.Anyway, the overall result is not on par with Boetticher's classic Ranown series of westerns, made at about the same time, (The Tall T {1957}, et al.). It's a comparison that may indicate the importance of producer Harry Joe Brown to that exceptional series. Nonetheless, Westbound is still worth a look-see as Scott turns in another fine performance.

Agree with other viewers that "Westbound" is the least of the seven Budd Boettcher/Randolph Scott westerns. But the assured work of both Director Boettcher and Star Scott take this up a notch or two from the run-of-the-mill fifties oater. Nice work too from Michael Pate as the arch villain (watch the way he moves). And it's good to see Virginia Mayo, even in a throwaway role. In most other respects, though, this just isn't up to Boettcher's other work with Scott, and the fact Boettcher dismissed and virtually disowned it is no surprise. The movie lacks the tough, lean feel that makes the others real classics that can be seen over and over. One viewing is enough for "Westbound."