Watch Teen Patti For Free

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Memorable, crazy movie

It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

This movie is a waste of excellent actors. Movie starts out OK but story and direction are poor. Use of poor lighting is likely deliberate but makes the whole movie feel even slower and shadier. It starts out OK with hopes raised due to a different subject from the usual good vs evil struggle. There is even an attempt to develop different characters and make some of them edgier with the addition of drugs, debts etc. But the movie starts drifting soon - like a boat without a captain on waves. Screenplay and direction are two key weak points. There is almost nothing to mitigate the poor direction. Even top notch actors are unable to rescue the movie.

My expectations were already rock-bottom after watching Leena Yadav's "Shabd". When Amitabh Bachchan, Hinduja's, Ben Kingsley and Madhavan have agreed to participate I thought Leena Yadav has a winner in her hands which will not only wash away her sins but also catapult like a phoenix. Big B's character is too idealistic to relate. Shades of grey like in "Kaante" would have added sheen to the role of Venkat Subramanian. And he was looking quite old actually and his disenchantment showed.Ben Kingsley was completely wasted. Edit his role completely and even a fly wouldn't budge. Incorporating him into the movie just fuelled marketing of bad apples.Raima Sen hardly had meat in her character. Shraddha Kapoor seems promising and has a good screen presence.Ajay Devgun, Jackie Shroff, Mahesh Manjrekar, Shakti Kapoor, Tinnu Kapoor & Ranjeet gave the blast from the past 1980's feeling. What were Mita Vashist & Shivkumar Subramaniam were actually doing?There are too many unnecessary characters and unwanted layers in the movie. Even the ode to "Bonnie & Clyde" was out of sync. Keeping the blackmailer in the hoods was not ably handled (Whodunnit? Audience couldn't care any less actually).Already the movie was facing the plagiarism threat from 21, so anything more it sank it deeper.The ending was so 1980's, melodramatic & Bollywood'ish.

Having immense potential, this film unfortunately turns out to be strictly average. The whole movie is about a group of students and teachers that get trapped in an underworld gambling ring. The movie was promoted showing how mathematics can be utilized to manipulate games, deduce card dealings, and accurately predict hands. While these do occur, absolutely no details regarding the formula, its discovery, its teachings, etc. are given. There's just all this hoopla of a probability theory with nonsensical numbers and equations constantly being written in the air, and the audience is just supposed to blindly trust what Amitabh is saying without even getting an opportunity to understand it. Another part of the false advertising was that it is supposed to be a very slick, stylish, thriller, which it was not. Songs were good, but character development was poor. The final monologue by Amitabh is some sort of a saving grace, but a little too late.

Who would've thought Bollywood producers would dare to experiment with a script on Mathematical Probablity equations!!! But, here we go - Amitabh Bachchan as Professor Venkat Subramaniam is a reclusive Math teacher in a college where no one really appreciates his ideas because of his eccentric ways. Silently buried in research for 30 years something, Venkat suddenly hits upon a blockbuster theory, something that should forever change the course of mathematics. According to the director, probably the last person to make similar impact in the field of Mathematics was Sir Issac Newton when he saw the apple fall from a tree. As a symbolism, the professor is shown receiving the Cambridge University's Issac Newton nomination before the credits roll.So far, so good. But, I lost interest in the film as soon as it was clearly evident that a lot of scenes had been straight lifted from Kevin Spacey starring "21". From a Jim Sturgess character who's facing a huge debt and must somehow find a way out (Madhavan's character), to a genius Mathematics professor who hits upon a brainwave idea in "Teen Patti"; in the English version it was Blackjack. Throw in scenes of gambling dens, underworld criminals and you get the complete picture. I was able to predict climax scenes too, such as the identity of the blackmailer.I was expecting to see more out of Ben Kingsley but his character was simply mired in some sort of mystique without backing it up with background or foundation. But, the bigger disappointment was this blatant script plagiarism. That alone should make me rate it 2 stars or less.