Watch The Quick and the Undead For Free
The Quick and the Undead
The movie takes place in the present, but in this universe, a plague has broken out and the infected have been transformed into zombies. No explanation is provided for the source of the plague, nor is it explained how the original victims were infected, since by the time the narrative begins the infection spreads by bite. Nevertheless, the action starts 80 years after the initial outbreak. The western United States has devolved into a disconnected series of ghost towns overrun by zombies, and the government is awarding bounties in exchange for the pinkies of the undead.
Release : | 2006 |
Rating : | 2.8 |
Studio : | |
Crew : | Director, Writer, |
Cast : | Clint Glenn Hummel |
Genre : | Horror Action Western |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
![](https://static.madeinlink.com/ImagesFile/movie_banners/20170613184729685.png)
![](https://static.madeinlink.com/ImagesFile/movie_banners/20170613184729685.png)
![](https://static.madeinlink.com/ImagesFile/movie_banners/20170613184729685.png)
Related Movies
Reviews
Undescribable Perfection
Simply Perfect
Fantastic!
One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.
the most voted review has 52 views and 29 people liked it, meaning the remaining votes who didn't must be the failed people who made the movie.I've never seen so much stupidity in such a compact manner. First seen, the guy puts a crate..in the TRUNK OF A BIKE? what the.. was that? he put the crate in the floor! and the whole acting is just horrible..as mentioned before. the blonde..guy..girl..whatever it was, was the only good actor..actress?anyway, BOWL OF FAIL! 0/10boring, waste of time.advice for people behind the movie.. if you are going to play with guns, know how to use them.
I feel sorry for this movie, it only got a measly 2.7 in average. A fate that I do not think it deserves. Many of the posts about this movie has been way to harsh in judging it according to me. Sure it is a B-movie, but what do you expect from a low budget zombie movie? I think this movie has elements that could have been done better with a little more budget in the special FX department. BUT it has one thing that many other zombie movies lack, and that is consistency.The world they presented to us seemed solid and plausible in the light of the facts stated in the beginning of the movie. The plot stayed inside its own boundaries throughout the entire length of the movie. Admirable for a movie of this kind. Not the best zombie movie I have ever seen, but far from the worst. I am proud to award this movie with a vote that is more than twice of its current average. That should bump up the stats a little.
In my current quest to seek out and view every zombie movie ever made, when I saw this on the shelf at Blockbuster, free rental coupon in hand, I figured, what the hey? Guess what? I was pleasantly surprised. And NO, I had NOTHING to do with the making of this film! I never even HEARD of it before I saw it in the store! OK, so it's obviously an indie flick, and it rips off from just about every other zombie and/or western ever made. But I was intrigued by a future populated with zombies, and the remaining survivors resorting to living like the old West, complete with hats and six-shooters. Only problem I had was the plot twist--at first, I thought, Ingenious! But then, I'm like, OK, this is supposed to be the post-apocalyptic future, where zombies take over (ala "Land of the Dead"). So if they're running out of zombies, why aren't things getting back to some semblance of normal?? The acting WAS kinda shallow as well--I kept looking at the hero as a poor-man's Hugh Jackman (leather, scruffy, smokes a stogie, tough guy with a heart of gold, that kinda thing). And the bad guy (Blythe) reminded me of a young Dennis Hopper. But for a free rental, it wasn't that awful. A pretty good plot, a few clever camera tricks, half-way decent zombie gore (without going overboard)--not bad for a free rental.
I just saw this movie on my home theater projection system and I think the biggest problem with this film is the lack of character development and the average acting. The movie is shot in video 24P high def, which has its color saturation limits, which in this movie hurt the overall look. Some scenes seemed extremely dark, and the DVD M-Peg 2 encoders they used were probably not the best. It was also a very short length movie, which I feel if they took more time to create the characters, it would have improved things. I have worked on low budget movies and it is extremely difficult to orchestrate continuity in the story and character development. So lets give these guys a break and try to enjoy the creative side of this movie!