Watch Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets For Free

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Absolutely the worst movie.

This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.

Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

"Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets" is as magical as its predecessor, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone." All praises I had from the first film (acting, storyttelling, everything else) stayed in the second film. As for flaws, this second HP film has some1.) IT'S TOO LONG!! The first 30 minutes of the movie could have been shortened to 15 minutes as those scenes did not need to be that long. 2.) Too much & too "on the nose" set-ups/exposition. A lot of things were explained/set-up for upcoming scenes. Some were very obvious while others made the film 5 minutes too long. Such scenes include: the "baby trees" teaching scene where the teacher said they can unpetrify students, Justin telling Harry he's muggle-born and Ron's broken wand. 3.) What's up with the Weasley car!? They never explained that. Overall, if not for the 3 reasons above, this film could have been y good as its predecessor. Sadly, it's slightly not as good. It's still great, though

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets was directed again by Chris Columbus, and again stars Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and Richard Harris. It is a sequel to Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, taking place one year later at Hogwarts.This time, it seems that a mysterious terror is "petrifying" specific characters, and again it's up to Harry, Ron, and Hermoine to stop them all while learning some new backstory regarding Draco Malfoy, Voldemort, and Hagrid.I'm not ashamed to admit that I LOVED this movie and book when I first read and saw it. It was one of my favorites of the franchise, and I was unsure why it is considered by many to be the least of the franchise.Now that I have rewatched it, I have noticed some flaws that I failed to notice earlier, mainly the fact that it is a semi-rehash of the previous film, and how it has more or less the same problems as the previous film (uninteresting parts, subpar acting, an easy-to-solve mystery, etc.). However, in the film's defense I feel as if The Chamber of Secrets is a copy of Sorcerer's Stone, but one that is done better. This film captures the creativity and charm and likability of the world much better than the predecessor. I also appreciate the film for upping the stakes, especially with (SPOILER) the basilisk at the end, which by the way, is an effect that still impresses me.I highly recommend this film, if you liked the first film you'll like this one too.RATING:7/10

Another awesome movie of Harry Potter which I liked. The chamber of secrets has been opened by the heir of Slytherin, who is a Gryffindor. The chamber has been yet again opened by Ronald Weasley's sister, Ginny Weasley. This chamber when opened, unleashes a strong, powerful snake, and that, that if you see its eyes, you may die.This snake always travels in pipes and drains, so that it can prevent people from seeing it. The chamber of secrets is also very hard to find. It's hidden somewhere underneath the washbasin of the girls' dormitory and to open it, you need to speak in Parseltongue (the language which snakes speak). Harry Potter knows Parseltongue and therefore unlocks the chamber to kill the great snake. The chamber has many passages to the main area. Harry Potter also meets Tom Marvolo Riddle (when unscrambled "Lord Voldemort".Now it's Harry Potter's adventure to close the chamber of secrets and prevent chaos and a number of people from dying.

Here's round two of the adventures of young wizard Harry Potter and friends. While not a terrible movie, this one is probably my least favorite and the most forgettable. It's more faithful than the previous film, but that's not entirely a good thing, as this one really drags, and, at this point, it's not quite necessary yet since the books didn't start getting really detailed, ambitious, and overblown until part 4. Columbus returns as director, and this time we follow 12 year-old Harry going through his second year of schooling. As if rival students, menacing teachers, and loads of schoolwork weren't enough, things start getting dire at school when people are found petrified like statues, threats are written on walls in blood, and a monster is on the loose. Even a gifted wizard like Harry may have some serious trouble coping. I can appreciate that they were trying to be more faithful to the book, but they might have been too faithful. It's my least favorite entry, and, while it's not boring, it's just not gripping enough, I feel, to warrant a film of such length. At least the film is good about balancing the tone fairly well. All the actors are fine, and they are only getting better and more comfortable with the characters with each new entry. Harris made his swan song here as Dumbledore, but his replacement in part 3 takes up the mantle with ease. All in all, a decent movie, but like I said, probably my least favorite.