Watch Hostel: Part III For Free
Hostel: Part III
Set in Las Vegas, the film centers on a man who attends his best friend's bachelor party, unaware of an insidious agenda that plays into hunting humans.
Release : | 2011 |
Rating : | 4.6 |
Studio : | Next Entertainment, Stage 6 Films, RCR Media Group, |
Crew : | Production Design, Set Decoration, |
Cast : | Kip Pardue Brian Hallisay John Hensley Sarah Habel Chris Coy |
Genre : | Horror |
Watch Trailer
Cast List
Related Movies
Reviews
Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
Beautiful, moving film.
The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.
Since Eli Roth wasn't directing or writing Hostel part III, I thought that it will not be as good as the original two. I knew that, and still the third Hostel film disappointed me from the very beginning. It is completely distanced from the two previous film. Now they're not in Slovakia, but Las Vegas, which feels like a forced change. Was there a good reason not to use Slovakia anymore, or did Las Vegas just feel newer to the film-makers? The movie also feels distance to the viewer as well. Of course there is violence, scenes that should be extremely suspenseful, but for some reason they just aren't. Something left the movies when Eli Roth left them. Partially it feels like the film-makers don't have as much passion, but they are doing this while their eyes look like dollar signs. But I doubt the third part was made to get some closure to the original two. Hostel part III stands out, because it is an absolute failure compared to the other two. If you want to watch it, because you saw the first two, don't. This one feels like a completely different movie done with no passion at all. Even if the first two are basically just gore horror, they had a certain feeling to them, which made them as great as they are. That is missing from the third movie, which makes them a great disappointment.
Ukrainian couple Victor and Anka are taken prisoners by the Elite Hunting Club. Scott is having his bachelor party leaving his fiancée Amy behind. Instead of going golfing, Carter takes him to Vegas where they meet up with Mike and Justin. Kendra and Nikki invites them to something a little freaky. After a night of partying, Mike is taken. The other guys try to find him and encounter Kendra who is also looking for missing Nikki.It won't matter to fans whether this is good or not. The defacing is a good way to start but the bugs are kind of stupid. In general, I have a problem with moving the franchise to Vegas. Part of the appeal is clueless first world people going to third world backwaters where they get torn apart. This doesn't have that. The kills aren't as good as before. The gladiatorial combat also takes away from the message of the franchise where money can buy anything.
Hostel: Part III (2011) is the third (and final?) chapter in the Hostel series. This time instead of taking place in a hostel, it's about a group of friends who are looking for a wild night in Las Vegas for there friends bachelor party. But everything turns egg shape when they run afoul of those lovely folks from the Elite Hunting Club decide to do a little business with their wealthy clients in Sin City. Can the party boys elude those bored rich customers of Elite or will they end up on somebody's wall?The third chapter in the Hostel series is directed b Sami Raimi protégé Scott Spiegel and written by DTV scribe Michael Weiss. I thought the movie was a fun time waster that was entertaining but do not watch the R-Rated version because you'll miss out on makes the Hostel trilogy a cut above the rest.
Hostel: Part III was released a few years after the torture sub-genre lost its popularity with audiences. Many people blamed Hostel: Part II (which bombed) but the truth is that the torture craze (much like the self-referential slasher craze before it) was dying off. It could only sustain for so long. Which makes me wonder why the filmmakers wanted to make a third film. The absence of Eli Roth's masterful direction is definitely to the movie's detriment. This second sequel is far less gruesome than the others. Though it has some interesting ideas (the "murder casino" comes to mind) and a couple of pretty cool twists, the novelty of the first two movies has worn off. It just comes across as unnecessary.