Watch GoldenEye For Free

Load of rubbish!!

Don't listen to the negative reviews

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

The right of reality, to be treated with respect, is the same as the right of fantasy to be treated with disrespect. Reality getting to be taken seriously means that fantasy is permitted the right to be regarded as something that's nonsense. A disrespectful treatment, is the respect of no treatment. Fantasy's right to be given disrespectful treatment is the equivalent of fantasy having the right to the dignity of no treatment. Fantasy's right is not the same as fantasy, however: the right of fantasy is the illusion of fantasy, and it's a lack of right.The right of fantasy, is to possess the non-possession of the dignity of no treatment - to possess the impossible truth that it's possible to respectfully ignore something.It's an impossible reality, to have the power to ignore something and possess the experience in a dignified way. Ignoring something inevitably means an experience of disrespect.The impossible truth, that ignoring something can mean dignity is the illusion of fantasy - the reality of reality is therefore the opposite, being the ability to ignore something and let the experience have respect.To ignore something, is to know that something exists and yet let the existence be uninterrupted: letting the experience of letting the existence go uninterrupted have respect implies that the existence itself isn't meant to have respect.GoldenEye is perhaps an exceptionally intellectual film, as its style is concerned with the charisma of going out of one's way to save the experience of logical avoidance

Answer this: what merit is there in creating a cardboard-deep narrative with totally interchangeable components in every possible facet of the movie ? Like a cliché villain, cliché lines, cliché everything. The entire thing is a disposable piece of commercial rubbish that could've been made any two thousand or whatever other ways and landed exactly the same caliber.The intro scene is beyond risible, I really can't imagine anyone taking it seriously in any potential way. The theme song is horrendous.The entire film is almost literally 5 minutes of headache-enducing line delivery, then an explosion, then 5 minutes of dialog again, then an explosion. There are buildings exploding, there are people exploding, there are guns being fired full blast, there are trains catching fire (like, on the outside), there are tanks exploding, there are buildings collapsing... and then there's Famke Janssen's absolutely ridiculous role and pretty face, Pierce Brosnan's pseudo-smarty pants frown for about two hours straight...Amazingly, it's over two hours. Two hours of this.It got a good press at the time it came out, because mind you between the last of Dalton's Bond in the late 80's and this, 6 years went by without a Bond. Surely a record. But besides that fact of cinema, good Lord, this thing is a whole bunch of nothing.

This is the best James Bond film ever made and stands tall above all the others. The bullets don't stop in this awesome ride of Bond fun! The characters are strong and the acting is excellent. Both the male and female caters are well cast, and has once of the best Bond villains ever. The ending is amazing! This is the best in the whole series! I give Goldeneye a 7/10

This is a strong James Bond 007 movie. A really entertaining film. Pierce Brosnan is a great actor who is awesome as 007. Sean Bean is a great villain. The female characters are strong and do a good job in their roles. The action sequences are amazing. I have always liked the story of the film, it was interesting.