Watch 2 Days in the Valley For Free

It is not deep, but it is fun to watch. It does have a bit more of an edge to it than other similar films.

it is finally so absorbing because it plays like a lyrical road odyssey that’s also a detective story.

While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

'2 days in the valley' is, as many films are, modeled after the work of Quentin Tarantino. A complicated crime story mixed with a lot of (near absurd) comedy on a deadpan level. And this one, like some others do as well, gets away with it. There are plenty of fun characters, the entanglements are fun and at times even pretty original, and the actors do pretty good jobs, especially Danny Aiello, Gregg Cruttwell, Jeff Daniels, James Spader and Charlize Theron - though I have no specific complaints about anyone in particular.A crime story, as said, and with a lot of comedy, but, also, there are some dramatic touches here and there, which pushes '2 days...' into the sentimental, but never too much. Nearing the end, there are a few too many happy coincidences for my taste, but alas.7 out of 10.

"2 Days in the Valley" feels like one of those '90s movies that walks in the footsteps of "Pulp Fiction" (cosmic coincidences, lives interweaving, all happening in L.A.) . . . "Go" has also been compared to Tarantino's movie, but that was at least darkly comic about it."Valley" never reaches the heights of those movies, even with such a large cast and an advertised catfight between Teri Hatcher and Charlize Theron. It's not funny and there's never really a payoff. Characters learn lessons about life, but that's where the movie gets syrupy. It's like a fantasyland version of Southern California.But a dull fantasy.5/10

I've had this movie in my collection for a few years and just got around to watching it. It was given to me as a gift. I agree with other reviews that it was trying to clone Pulp Fiction, which is a much better movie. There were scenes that I really liked, although it was a little slow in connecting them. The cast was incredible. I just wish there was a little more to work with. Terintino's dialog writing skills would have made this a much better movie. Charlize Theron was incredible. I would have liked to see more of her. The version that I have is the old style snap case and it was widescreen, but not anamorphic.

Only in Los Angeles,art there for sure-but for an enjoyable movie-come on! The dialogue uses f*** as a noun,verb,adjective & adverb in every scene with the characters as about as tasteless & bizarre as the attempted depiction of crime comedy. Worth seeing to get an understanding of how 'bad' current avant guard is? Rating should be "UW" - unwatchable. and best filed under 'junk mail' But- all types for all folk- See it and decide if this review and the reviewer 'need help'? The Producer/Director certainly do! Like so many 'Pulp Fiction'movies this was just one more attempt to open eyes to someones idea of reality in the Valley- Maybe,but surely even great art show be at least stimulating and give rise to one wondering - too much? In this day of information overload the movie is surely another piece or movie to be classed as junk mail at its prime?Chaque a son gout,but to have this shown as cinema in the most educated liberal sense is a reflection on how we are sinking, cinema should be able to be entertaining,this offering is flattered by a description of tastelessness at its finest.As for using 'comedy' even 'sick comedy' is stretching the English language beyond all meaning