Watch The Island of Dr. Moreau For Free

Good movie but grossly overrated

Absolutely brilliant

Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties. It's a feast for the eyes. But what really makes this dramedy work is the acting.

The Island of Dr. Moreau (1977) ** 1/2 (out of 4)Andrew Braddock (Michael York) shipwrecks and eventually washes up on a jungle island. Once there he is introduced to Dr. Moreau (Burt Lancaster) who at first seems like a nice guy simply doing research. Pretty soon Andrew begins to realize that the doctor is doing strange experiments between men and animals and the result are some mutated creatures living in the jungle.Whenever people speak about the H.G. Wells adaptations of this story, it seems this one here is forgotten and sometimes it doesn't even come up. Of course, they always discuss the greatness of 1932's ISLAND OF LOST SOULS and they always discuss the disastrous Marlon Brando version. Why is this film from 1977 rarely mentioned? I'm going to guess because it's not really a flat-out horror movie. The majority of its running time it appears to be trying to be a real medical drama and a showcase for Lancaster.Is that a bad thing? I personally don't think so but it does make for a rather slow running time and I'm sure some people would have preferred more horror elements or more of a spotlight being placed on the creatures. With that said, I think this is a mildly entertaining movie thanks in large part to the performances in the film. Lancaster always carried himself with such grace that he had no problem fitting into this role to where people could see this character and think that he was a good man. I thought Lancaster was good in the part, although the screenplay never really allowed him a chance to go crazy or mad.York was also good in the lead role, although his character too suffers from not getting too much to do until the very end. Nigel Davenport is good in the supporting role as the doctor's help and Barbara Carrera made for a good love interest. Richard Basehart got to play the role originated by Bela Lugosi and I couldn't help but think that Basehart had seen the earlier version and remembered Lugosi's performance.With all of that said, the film really does come to life during the final fifteen-minutes once the creatures decide that they have had enough. I thought the various animals that were used were great and I also thought the action was nice. There were some tense moments that happened during the final action sequence so overall the film at least goes out on a good note.

... although any limitations on what could have been shown or done were much more lax in this film 44 years later. Yet I just like the original better.This is another take on the H. G. Wells novel about the "mad" scientist experimenting with animals on a South Seas island, performing surgery on them in "the House of Pain" to try to transform them into human beings. Of course, things never go as planned in these films. Moreau is, after all, "tampering in God's domain" (though that hoary old expression is mercifully not used in this film).Difficult to not compare this version to the first adaption, 1933's Island of Lost Souls, which I find far more satisfactory. In the original Charles Laughton brought a creepy, perverse quality to his Moreau. He was unsettling but effective, and when he cracked that whip in the "What is the law?" scene with the man beasts there was more than a hint of the sadist about him.The surprising casting of Burt Lancaster as Moreau in the 1977 version fails to bring any of these same odious qualities to the film. It's difficult to work up much of a dislike for Lancaster's scientist in spite of his activities. He's still Burt, and he has to battle against his good guy screen persona.Island of Dr. Moreau also surprisingly jettisons one of the kinkiest aspects of the 1933 film, the Panther Girl, as originally played by Kathleen Burke, his most near perfection human like creation from a beast, with whom Laughton's Moreau is eager to see if an unsuspecting male shipwrecked on his island (Richard Arlen) will be willing to mate.The '77 version does have beautiful Barbara Carrera slinking around, and she certainly intrigues (well, more than intrigues) Michael York, now in the Arlen role. Lancaster is aware that they are sexually attracted to each other and ready to mate - but to what purpose, since it turns out Carrera is a normal human, and no kind of Panther Girl. There is a hint in her final scene, however, that she may not be quite so normal, after all, but it went by so quickly I wasn't quite certain if it was my imagination.The man beasts in the original are more effective than here. For starters, you didn't get a really good look at the makeup in the original (outside of a closeup of Bela Lugosi), so much of it is left to the audience's imagination. In the '77 version you see the makeup and, to be honest, it's not so much frightening as it is artificial in appearance (on about a par with that to be found in the original Planet of the Apes).The '77 version, however, interestingly, does show what happens to the man beasts after everything blows up on the island, something the '33 original left to our imagination. This version also has Moreau strapping down and experimenting with York, something not done in the '33 version. That is one of the more interesting aspects of this production, as well.In the final analysis, this is a fairly mediocre adaption of the Wells story, but one should still see it to make his own assessment. There would be another version with Brando almost 20 years later, of course. It's been too long since I've seen that version to talk about it, though I do recall disliking it at the time.

A shipwrecked survivor (Michael York) discovers a remote island with a mad scientist (Burt Lancaster).Some people argue there has never been a good adaptation of "The Island of Dr. Moreau". Maybe it is because I never read the book, but I think those people are wrong. "The Island of Lost Souls" is excellent, and I believe it is now part of the Criterion Collection (as it should be). And the 1990s version has its charms, despite its many faults.And this one is quite good, clearly the inspiration for Devo and House and Pain, probably even more so than "Lost Souls". Michael York is a brilliant actor and adds weight to science fiction. Burt Lancaster is pretty decent, too, and makes a good villain.

Based on a novel by H G Wells. H G Wells had number of revolutionary ideas such as the Time Machine, War of the Worlds, and this Island of Dr Moreau, of all opened up a new topic in scientific development. Today, invasion from outer space, time travel, and genetic experiments are mainstream topic if not in science, certainly in the movies, and in novels.Two sailors on a life raft reach an uncharted island. Braddock, one of the sailor discovers that the island is inhabited by Dr. Moreau who is conducting experiments on animals. He soon discovers that the island is also inhabited by strange creatures who looks half man and half beast.Movie was made by American International Pictures that made series of B movies back in the '70s. This movie is perhaps the most serious and artistic of all the movies made by the company. It was an exciting new type of movie when it was released, but perhaps due to insufficient development in technology, and modest budget, the execution has something to be desired. The man-animals obviously looks like they're made of prosthetics that takes away from the experience (a lot), and Michael York who played the lead was too weak to carry the story. Maybe they should have given the lead to Richard Basehart and the movie would have been a lot better. the cinematography could have been better too. It has no mood of mystery that the story requires.So the movie misses the mark in critical ways, but maybe American International never intended it to be a masterpiece. I'm hoping that someone will remake this movie in the way it should be, but the odd topic of the story may keep it as a novelty.