Watch Vampireland For Free

Good movie, but best of all time? Hardly . . .

disgusting, overrated, pointless

It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

The first must-see film of the year.

As others have said indie films can be good. However that is not the case here. I don't even know where to begin this review because it's utter garbage. Don't waste your time. Thankfully i watched it for free on their website or is demand my money back. I feel bad for the people who paid for this. Costumes were god awful spray painted robes were the worst. Nothing about this movie is salvageable except maybe the fireman he was decent.The ending along with the whole movie was unnecessary especially with the 4 horsemen raping the girl to death. Disgusting. Will never watch any of their films again. I'd give it a negative rating if I could.

This is an off-beat vampire film that doesn't make the grade; its one saving grace is that there are some decent special effects, if you like seeing people shot through the head and stuff like that. Some of it is rather silly though, like when a newly created vampire picks up a tank and throws it. There is also a passable but very thin soundtrack, but once you've said that, you've said it all.What is the plot? As far as there is one, it's the end of the world, and the vampires are taking over. There appears too to be a group of people who are prepared to betray the rest of Mankind for a promise of immortality, like you can ever trust a vampire? The main character is a woman named Shelly; it's her blind date who is turned into the tank-throwing vampire. She suffers a great deal of pain, but survives, which is more than most of the others do. The big question though is can you survive to the end of the film? Only if you're watching it on YouTube so you can multitask.

Where on earth do you start with rubbish like this?There are two reviews as I write this. Both are positive. That males them seriously biased.The storyline talks about 'Indie horror mainstay' John Vincent. That means he's made three films in 15 years.He's directed, edited, produced and written them. Oh, and written the music. And presumably done the sound and chosen the 'actors', because all of these tasks are done at around the same level. Really, REALLY badly.There are long, and I do mean, long, unedited shots of, for example, a priest getting to work unlocking, walking around, taking books out of a cupboard, sitting down, opening the books, making VERY LARGE notes, and so on. Also an inordinately long and boring on foot chase.All of the suspense, if we could call it that, is spoilt by a sound track which sounds like bad dubbing, but isn't. It just all sounds post production and no-one noticed that it was done in a basement with bad acoustics.No stand out performances, the best, Michel Bugard, ruined by some really rubbish 'special' effects.And, now I come to think of it, WHY? Why would vampires, (admittedly vampires dressed in sheets - nice touch), want to kill everyone? Don't they need blood to survive? Why slaughter lunch when you need lunch to stay alive?To be fair, this may be answered later in the film. I could only manage 30 minutes. And I somewhat resent that.

Hi, had to join so I could vote this sh*t down... I usually don't give a damn about bad movies, I watch ten minutes and then I say - not for me - and turn it off... but, but... for me to join IMDb just so I can warn you all so you don't waste any time/money on this crap... well you guess how bad it is...I've seen quite a few movies and I still payed to see this crap, (shame on me) it shouldn't even be called a movie... it's like vomit on film.OK, by now you should have understood what all, even slightly intelligent, people will think about this crap... so move on, nothing to see here, watch some old movie that you like, again, 'cause this sh*t will only make you angry, like it made me :/