Watch Lost Woods For Free

Funny, strange, confrontational and subversive, this is one of the most interesting experiences you'll have at the cinema this year.

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Its okay, I wouldn't rate 10/10 just because I don't think its inappropriate for PG-13 users. Since there is a lot of swearing and inappropriate things in it, I would probably rate it as R-rated. I would probably also give this a 6/10 because the story doesn't make sense. If maybe there wasn't so much swearing, then I would change my offer to 10/10. Even though this movie is 3 years old. Maybe they should make a second one much better. The reviews seem to only get 1-4 stars because of the rating. So maybe if the movie was less advanced and more pg-13ish than other kids including teens and adults, will watch this movie.

Consider that this film was made for less than what other productions spend on catering, it is a decent effort from what is clearly a family business (just read all the end credits). The rudimentary special effects for the creature are balanced against a beautiful location and able camera work. The characters are not one-sided, and there's even a fair amount of character development as the story progresses. The relationships in this close-knit group of friends and relatives and a pet are the core of this story, and the external threats are secondary. The opening credits with the graphic novel style are a nice touch. The company might have been wiser to do all the creature scenes the same way. There are a number of strong spots where they went against the trite "standard creature vs. group of friends" clichés, and this deserves some respect above other entry-level productions. Examples: there's only one female, but she's regarded as a friend, not a target for the men. I would knock a point off that because she had to cook and call the men to dine as though she were the house mother. The "science nerd" is not an inept guy who can't socialize. In fact, this is a rare character who obviously works out and has a nice tat, truly swimming up-stream in horror movies. The "dumb guy" isn't dumb at all, just very open and unpretentious. The "scared guy" is not a total flake as in other films. The "leader" is calm and confident and actually knows how to get around outdoors. Spoiler: There's no dog violence, thank goodness! The last time I saw a horror flick with a dog that survived happily through the whole thing, it was an early film from The Asylum, and the production values were not even as good as for this film. There were a few very minor editing problems where the story jumped, but later conversations filled in the missing information. Pacing was also uneven. Still, this is an ambitious film by so many newcomers, and I don't think it deserves a bashing. One reviewer surely didn't see the same film I did, else he would not have said it was about teenagers. Hopefully, any future projects will have better research and props. One does not have to go to Honduras or anywhere else outside the US to get a nice machete, and it seems visually odd that the person who has that cannon of a sidearm and some large blades would not also have a more imposing rifle. The sight of burly men holding tiny rifles is nearly comical, and that includes the rude men who claimed to own the land. I think this company did a passing job, and I hope they will learn from the experience and give us something more in the future.

Well, OK. The movie is not going to be an award nominee. Just get it down if you are about to watch this film. Managing expectations is a point in this case. Comic-ish intro sequence is actually rather good and sets you up for something with greater production value, but it is a decoy. The intro is probably the best part of this film.Overall, the whole thing looks like a student's work, and almost every part of it leaves you wishing for better. Better acting, better camera work, better script, better FX.... It is not horrible, its just not on the level we are taught to expect from modern-era cinema, with millions of dollars invested into the making of a single movie.Despite all downsides, I rated it 7. I found it to have a certain... charm. When you get to the core of it, it is not your typical "picnic-in-the-woods-turn-massacre" slasher. The whole thing is a rather dull implemented plot device to tell you a story of a person's journey from being a scared boy to a man. The monster is really secondary to that. It could be as well "group-of-friends-escape-building-on-fire", or some other dramatic event. And this is what I liked, the film has a message, its not just blood! guts! gore! tits! of an average horror flick.

1. I think the characters' tattoos were done with Sharpie pens. 2. Pretty much the whole movie was filmed in the daytime -- so they all went to bed around 5 PM, or so (maybe earlier) -- I am guessing it was so that they could film the whole thing in a few hours. 3. Porno movies have better acting... Hell, porno movies have better PROPS(they used the same rifle for two different characters). During target practice they shot a rifle at FULL beer bottles... oh, and the rifle's scope cap was on for some of the target practice. Rather than re-shoot the scene with the scope cap off, they just made sure that it was off for the last guy practicing with the rifle. Good thing they caught that one. 4. The "bad" guy is an actor dressed up in a big furry suit. A yeti or big-foot kind of thing, except this one throws actual punches. Seriously. Uppercuts, roundhouses, jabs... none of that normal slashing or clawing one might expect. 5. At some point the campers return to find their friend impaled on what is perhaps a truck's tailpipe... everyone gets upset yet no one actually asks what happened or why... they bury him, regardless, in a hole big enough for a pet garter snake. 6. If you watch this movie and are disappointed, it's your own fault. Quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen.