Watch The Hunchback of Notre Dame II For Free

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

One of my all time favorites.

Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

Although I seem to have had higher expectations than I thought, the movie is super entertaining.

How come making a sequel to the most mature and dark Disney movies ever ended up in this pile of cheesy c**p! Hell, the gargoyles were annoying characters in the original, now everything else is dumbed down to that level. I can't express my anger towards this effort: the songs are just awful and forgettable, the animation is flat and sickeningly bright, and the dialogue is sometimes eye-rollingly stupid. Example: the main object of the movie is a bell which is BEAUTIFUL ON THE INSIDE! GET IT, STUPID AUDIENCE! that's what I think about that line.By demeaning I mean taking all these talented actors who reprise their roles from the original and let them perform this shitty script. It is just out of respect of the real talents of such great actors. The new characters are either annoying (the little new kid, ugh!), bland and unappealing like Quasimodo's romance Madeleine (She has a personality of a pre-schooler, come on) and that villain has a vain personality which outmatches Gaston. The original had animation with an epic cinematic scope and a bombastic musical score which made Notre Dame and the rest of Paris look incredible with massive crowds, great angles and three- dimensional settings. Forget all that! Now we have animation of equal quality of an 80's TV-show and stilted characters with no personlities. Go suck it!And why does the movie contradict itself by making a travelling circus the antagonist? To me they look a lot like the gypsies from the original and they were fighting for acceptance by Parisian society, remember?We had to suffer all of this crap just because Quasimodo didn't get the girl in the first movie. Thanks a lot for ruining Disney's most mature and socially aware efforts.

I know...I know. Compared to the original, this one is far less dark, the music isn't as good, and it has a less epic scope but.... I can't help it. I like this movie.If you couldn't guess from the title, this is definitely one of my guilty pleasure movies. I can't defend it from a technical aspect, but I actually really do enjoy this movie. The main reason I suppose is I got really mad in the first movie seeing as how the moral was 'look at the beauty inside' and then Esmeralda marries the cute guy. (Shrug) i don't know, that just always really bothered me. I actually did want Quasimodo to get a romantic interest, and I do actually like Madelin's character as well as Jennifer Love Hewitt voicing her. The villain was cheesy, the stakes weren't as high, but, I liked the romantic character development. I wasn't too huge of a fan of the child character Zephyr, but, then again I am sure not too many people were. The animation is nothing to write home about and like I said everything technical about it is not very good. But...it still left me with a happy feeling and I enjoyed it and have watched it multiple times. I can understand people who don't like it solely based on how different the tone is from the first, but you gotta give em credit, they got back pretty much all the voice actors. That's gotta count for something. Still though, I know a lot of people didn't..but I really liked it. Chalk it up to a guilty pleasure.

I grew up on Disney a lot when I was a kid, and to this day there are still some films they made that I like. For this straight-to- video sequel, however, there is nothing really to say about it except that it is simply one of the WORST movies Disney has ever made, and it is not worth owning at all. All of the songs in this movie are really lousy, and lack the dark tone the songs in The Hunchback of Notre Dame 1 had. In addition, the animation of this sequel is very ugly like the character of Quasimodo, and the villain in this film, Serouche, is such a douche bag unlike Judge Claude Frollo in the first movie. In the end credits, though, I thought the song "I'm Gonna Love You" be Jennifer Love Hewitt was pretty, and it was a really good indicator that this horrible movie is over. To anyone who owns this movie on DVD at home, I would highly recommend you scratch up your discs against a wall, break your discs into pieces with your foot, gather up the broken pieces and take a picture of the broken discs on Facebook, and then just throw away all the pieces in your garbage cans. I also suggest you do this to DVDs of horrible films like "Pocahontas 2: Journey to a New World", "The Fox and the Hound 2", "Open Season", "The Muppets' Wizard of Oz", "Tarzan and Jane", "Twilight", "Daddy Day Care", "Monster House", "Honey We Shrunk Ourselves", "Gigli", "Happily 'N' Ever After", "Fat Albert" and many others that stunk (but not "The Cat in the Hat" with Mike Myers, because I like that one), as well as with all Kidz Bop and Justin Bieber CDs. To summarize this review in short, this film is terrible.

Frollo says it best, "A bit of a disappointment to me." This whole flick was a major disappointment in hundreds of ways. Let's start counting them down:For starters, the original movie was among the edgiest of movies Disney ever did at the time. It was dark, the environment was shadowy though occasionally bright, and the whole town looked three dimensional as did most of the characters. Forget all that! It's now all too bright in the sequel, making the dark Notre Dame look as if it had been made of gold, the art is two dimensional and flat as if the artists got lazy compared to the wonderful effort of the previous film. Plus compare the opening song number: Le Jour D'Amour to the Bells of Notre Dame; what sounds more awesome: an overly cheerful song, or a back story with the choir in the background? Yeah, that's how far down this sequel has gone; but it's not over yet!So the story is that Quasimodo still doesn't have a lover, still lives in Notre Dame even after Frollo's death (why?), and still is the bell ringer (again, why?). Last time we left the first film he left Notre Dame for good, so there's no real reason for him still living there - or at least one that's never explained! So anyways there's a circus that comes for the new festival Le Jour D'Amour, containing the villain and love interest: Sarousch and Madellaine. The main reason they came was to steal the diamond embroided bell, La Fidèle. Is it just me, or does this story stink already? Thought so. Oh and get this, they keep hammering the lesson: The inside matters more than the outside throughout the ENTIRE 95 minutes! It's a great lesson to learn, but all the signs are loudly in your face and repeating all the time, like a bell beautiful on the inside, smelling rosemaries that look like weeds, and so on; none of them subtle or clever! Those aren't even the worst of what I hate (I'll save the worst for last). First off, if you hated the gargoyles in the first film, trust me you'll hate them even worse here! Hugo: undeniably annoying, Victor: slap your head annoying, and the last one who's supposedly wiser is half out of character! (I bet Mary Wicks was glad she died before she played that role again). What's even worse about them is they're alive. It's Disney of course, but at the same time they knew how to keep still for everyone else except Quasimodo. Here they act as if they forgot how to freeze! Goodbye continuity! And speaking of out of character; Phoebus becomes Frollo and prejudges the circus thinking they're as bad as gypsies - oh and did I forget to mention he MARRIED A GYPSY! Also the relationship with Quasimodo and Madellaine was way too rushed and there was little to no chemistry shared in the movie or time to get to know them. All that was shown was them cracking a few jokes, walking/running around, staring at each other, and kiss. It's a 95 minute film! Enough time to show us a believable relationship! Another thing, this is two stories squeezed into one: 1) Quasimodo finding a lover 2) Saving Le Jour D'Amour. What bothers me about that story is that why was there a diamond bell in the first place? For one it probably wouldn't ring, also it would not be going on public display, and it sounds like any other bell, so there is no point in bringing it in. But what I hate worse is the villain! In the original film it was almost impossible to not love Frollo! He did all the wicked things you'd imagine: kill a mother (watch that scene in slow mo, he kills her), almost drowns her baby, locks him in the bell tower, forbids him from ever leaving the tower, has a huge prejudice against gypsies, lusts over women, wants to be sexual with them (G rated film?), and thinks that he is doing what God wants. Now that's a real villain! He was three dimensional, conflicted, hard hearted, cold, and had one of the edgiest, scariest, and darkest songs ever sung in a Disney movie: Hellfire! And what does the sequel give you? The throw-away villain from the live action Cat in the Hat! I'm not kidding you! He's just as bad, childish, and a complete narcissist! I take it back, not a complete narcissist; AN OVER THE TOP NARCISSIST! He'll make him look handsome when he's really ugly (again another not so subtle message), he steals gold, and take a gander at this line when he's about to steal the bell: "I'm rich, RICH! I wonder if they make diamond underwear." Even kids would say that this villain was stupid! Frollo was more interesting than that, and scary! So if you either love the book or the movie, take my advice and stay away from this film! It's not worth your time, unless you want to try and figure out how it could have been written better. This story insults a child's intelligence, whereas the original movie, while having faults was awesome and treated kids like grown ups. The only thing you could look forward to is at the end credits when Jennifer Love Hewitt singing "I'm Gonna Love You." That's it! Aside from that good moment, don't go near it!