Watch Copying Beethoven For Free

Best movie of this year hands down!

If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

I liked the movie as it dealt with Beethoven but I think that Ed Harris was wrong for the role of the composer. Despite being an English language film I think casting an American as a German is wrong. However, the scene featuring the Ninth Symphony premiere was magnificent.

I came upon this movie while looking for something to watch on cable TV. I have always enjoyed Ed Harris. I also love classical music. So, I decided to give it a go. From the first moments, I was completely engrossed. The music was splendid, the cinematography was gorgeous, and the storyline was compelling. But most of all, Ed Harris's performance was stellar. He deserved an Academy Award for this role. Like a chameleon, he disappears into each character he portrays and this was no exception - his acting was stupendous, admirable, incredible. The movie held my interest from start to finish.I have read where Copying Beethoven has been compared to Amadeus. When I first saw Amadeus in the theater, I knew it would win the Academy Award for Best Picture and that one or both of the main actors would win an Academy Award. The only comparisons I can make to the two movies are: Ed Harris should have won an Academy Award for his performance as Beethoven. Similarly, both movies had sensational music. And, each movie was glorious to the eye, titillating to the imagination, and heavenly to the ear.How did this movie fall through the cracks? Many viewers are missing a true classic if they have not had the opportunity to see this movie - and that is a colossal shame!

I feel cheated as well as betrayed after watching "Copying Beethoven" as i had great expectations from this flick especially after watching "AMADEUS",a movie based on Mozart. I was really excited before seeing this movie as for me it was more of a battle between the two great musicians,Mozart and Beethoven. I had thoroughly enjoyed "AMADEUS" as it has been superbly made and the characters of Mozart and Saleri have been executed with sheer brilliance. However,in this flick there is no life to the portrayal of Beethoven and the movie was completely pivoted around his female Copyist which according o me made no sense at all and made the movie boring. Acting wise the movie is good but factually as well as emotionally the movie is completely unreal as i never felt any sympathy for neither Beethoven nor her Copyist. What was the need of creating all the hype about the female copyist when you already have a mind-blowing plot of Beethoven's later life struggle. The only good elements in the movie are the philosophical aspects of Beethoven,his dialogs full of substance and the heavenly music but again if u compare it with the way it has been shown in "AMADEUS", you will feel for yourself that its a no match to the completely power-packed,entertaining,gripping and soulful AMADEUS !!!!

This is a movie about Ludwig von Beethoven for dumb people who've never heard of Ludwig von Beethoven. Why dumb people who've never heard of Beethoven would ever want to watch a film about him is something that should have been asked before this production ever got started.Anna Holtz (Diane Kruger) is a young student of music composition who's been sent to Vienna in 1824 to assist the famed maestro, Beethoven (Ed Harris). She is to be his copyist, taking his scribbled notes and rewriting it into something that can be distributed to musicians. The aging and almost deaf Beethoven is just days away from the premiere of his 9th Symphony and he's still writing it. That's the set up. What follows from that is, almost measure for measure, every cliché you ever see in one of these stories about a famous old guy and the young woman who admires him. He's impossibly difficult and abusive. She stands up to him. He comes to need her more than he admits to himself. She's the only one who stands by him in his declining years. Yadda, yadda, yadda.There are only two things of interest in Copying Beethoven. One is that you could use it as a class film for really stupid music students. It's less a story about Beethoven's life and music and more exercise in characters appearing on screen to plainly and awkwardly recite certain facts about the great genius. If you watch this movie, you'll come away having heard quite a lot of basic information about Beethoven toward the tail end of his musical career. The other interesting thing about Copying Beethoven is that it is a good reminder of how artists of any sort getting rich off their work is a very recent phenomenon. Creative types used to be dependent on the support of wealthy patrons, who generally didn't pay them that much. Here's Beethoven, who was famous for his music in his own life, yet he's living barely better than an upper middle class existence with a small apartment in a run down Vienna building. It is only when artists were able to sell their work to the masses that they could become rich, as well as famous.The acting of Ed Harris, Diane Kruger and the rest of the cast is fine, but these are all shallowly drawn characters behaving in bluntly obvious ways. There's never any emotion shown or action taken that isn't also explained, either by the character in question or someone else. This film also spends at least 15 minutes show Beethoven conducting the first performance of his 9th Symphony. The music is great and all, but on the screen it comes off as the world's longest and most boring music video of all time.I don't know if this script got excessively dumbed down at some point, but unless you're looking for a remedial primer on Beethoven's later life, you can give this movie a pass.