Watch Cemetery Man For Free

Slow pace in the most part of the movie.

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

Michele Saovi's wonderfully weird and wacky, art house horror flick is also kind of a throwback to the Fantastique genre of the 1970s. Lush, beautiful cinematography, Surreal, Gothic piece about Francesco Dellamorte, engineer- oh, sorry, that's right, he doesn't like to be called that, he's a *caretaker*, at a small Cemetery, and he and his Joe Besser-lookalike helper have their hands full with The Returners, recently deceased who come back to life to devour the living, who can only be killed permanently by a bullet to the head. Dellamorte keeps experiencing visions of a mysterious, nameless girl with whom he falls in love, but then has to kill after she is attacked by a Returner. But she appears to come back yet again.....Atmospheric horror have some great effects, and some really weird touches of comedy, like Dellamorte reading the telephone books for fun and recreation, even going so far as to call them "classics"! (I thought I was odd because I read dictionaries for recreation) Things like that gives the film humour, as well as giving the characters nuances and depth, as does Dellamorte's inner monologue.

What can you say about a movie that brilliantly intertwines zombies inexplicably rising from the dead in one particular cemetery, one misfit man who has the lonely mission to kill them and then goes insane doing it, and the mixture of horror and religious symbolism as only the Europeans can do it? The final scene of the movie has you questioning whether any of these people ever existed at all, even within the context of the film. In this last scene, Dellamorte (the cemetery man) decides to just drive away from the existence he has had up to now and start over somewhere else. However, when he leaves the tunnel that connects the town with the main highway he finds ... nothing. The world just ends as if you were on the set of "The Truman Show". You'll certainly never look at a snow globe the same way again.Did Dellamorte hallucinate the whole movie? Did the audience dream the whole movie? Are we all just characters in someone else's imagination? For you Buffy fans out there, you'll love the mixture of someone on a lonely thankless path to save the world and a tragically ended romance due to the protagonist's focus on his mission.

********************************************************** ************** Warning Spoilers ************************** ********************************************************** As a zombie film I found the movie lacking. Luckily it seems to have deeper layers to explore and only in that and some of the visuals is it worth seeing. I just hope the writers intended the deeper meanings and I'm not seeing what was never meant to be there. My initial thoughts while watching this film were that Dellamorte's experiences were different guises of what humans experience as love. For instance the all consuming "love" of the teenager infatuated with the dead motorcycle guy. She couldn't deal with the thought that he may have loved another woman and not her. These feeling were manifested in her being literally eaten alive by his zombie self and her accepting it as her fate in order to please him. There were crimes that were committed and not blamed on Dellamorte. As if no one could come to grips with the fact that love can kill, especially scorned love or rejected love. Instead the inspector looks for another killer, because Dellamorte (who represents the focal point of love here) could not possibly be the killer even if all evidence points to him. Dellamorte even gets angry that his murders are being stolen from him. Nobody can see love as the killer or at least nobody wants to see love that way. In the first incarnation of She (Anna Falchi) we see what is probably Dellamorte's first real encounter with love/Sex. His first is a woman who shares his obsessions with death and uses it to bring out their passion. But this sort of passionate first love is fleeting and can't last it will eventually burn out and usually does quickly. The emotional specter of her own passionate first lover is there to haunt them and literally rises from the grave to kill her. Then there was the love that a man might feel is emasculating and a folly. This is shown by the second incarnation of She (Anna Falchi). Dellamorte is willing to cut off his genitals for her because the thought of making love is so frightening to her. His reward later is to find she has fallen for another man. This after driving him to try and commit the ultimate act to retain her love. He was willing to make this extreme sacrifice for her, ruining any possibility of other lovers for him. But instead of loving him back she falls for the man who abused and raped her. He was emasculated in two ways physically and mentally by her actions. Luckily thanks to the Doc one was only temporary. Or there was the guise of love that is really only greed. In the third incarnation of She, Dellamorte wishes to hear her say she loves him when they first meet. She does so to please him and then supplies him with a night of passion and joy, but not without a price. In the morning he finds that it's time to pay for her "love" with money. I believe there was one scene where Dellamote even said that his mother's name meant "Love" and how ironic that was to him. Of course I have only scratched the surface here trying to explain my reasoning. I think others who have seen the film may find other examples of the role the faces of love plays in the story. It's worth seeing if you take it at more than it's face value as a zombie film only.

The main problem with this thrown together piece of garbage is that it is merely a bunch of scenes where someone probably said 'Hey, you know what would be cool to see? X. Let's put X in it.' The film goes nowhere, makes no sense, and is pretty badly done. The special effects are also really bad, and not worth paying to see. (15% of their SFX budget was spent on fishing wire.) Reading these reviews here is like some kind of collegiate masters degree program in circle jerking. Everyone who is calling this some master work of art probably keeps their finger on the edge of their lip too much, nods their head, and speaks in a drowsy dismissive satirical upper class tone to everyone who disagrees so they won't be outed as the imbecile pseudo-intellectual sycophant they are. There is no plot to the movie, no coherency, and none of the ideas are followed to their logical conclusion or even exploited to retain the audience's interest; the script makes no sense and neither does most of the dialogue or events. The characters make no sense, and do not act in any consistent way. The police do not follow up leads, the idiot is or isn't actually smart, the hero is or isn't in love.. and the best friend we see twice is now a spree killer but only at the house the protagonist lit on fire to kill the 3 women the best friend actually killed during the fire? What? And this comes at the last third of the film? What? Who does that?Again their behavior is a result of an amateur writing with the 'You know what would be cool/funny?' or 'You know what all really good horror films have in common?' mindset, with no structure to the story at all. There is no continuity, and the only theme is it's set in a cemetery and one of the characters is a man. Otherwise, the film is nothing but an excuse to see the exquisite body of Anna Falchi(Anna Kristiina Palomaki) nude. And well, I can't argue there, that is the only reason this movie gets 3 stars from me, otherwise it is at best some first year art student's film project (hint; the student in question was majoring in booger sculpture, and not film). And this review contains no spoilers because nothing happens in the movie. This is a bad movie, and now only one of the only 3 I have ever walked out on. One being revenge of the nerds part 2, and some other film that was so bad I just went to another theater and forgot about it. It is really amazing to me though how peer pressure for 'horror aficionados' makes them all give great reviews for intrinsically bad movies just because they are horror films and they are fans circling the wagons or something. If you want to see a horror comedy Frankenhooker or Shaun of the Dead are better picks by astronomical leaps and bounds, and they actually have real stories, not a Tommy Wiseau type of after-the- fact reasoning that you are not looking deeply enough to discover the meaning. I won't because there is none. I don't dig through dog turds to discover meat scraps. The message of the movie is is this; if you are a name dropping director you know you probably have a good chance to sleep with the actresses you audition for movies so pick one you really like and write a terrible movie to cover it up. Final review; crappy movie + exquisite woman still can't save film. A horror comedy film where the best comedic acting was done by zombie boy scouts in 10 seconds is not that good.